Petitioner sought mandamus to extend benefits of a cooperative bank amnesty/One Time Settlement Scheme despite lapsed deadline. She failed to comply with interim directions to pay the amount determined by the Bank; the writ petition was dismissed as nothing remained for consideration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE 2024 / 17TH JYAISHTA, 1946
WP(C) NO. 11713 OF 2017
PETITIONER/S:
BABY.K.M AGED 58 YEARS
W/O.RAMACHANDRAN, MENIKATHARA HOUSE,ELTHURUTH, KODUNGALLUR.
BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENT/S:
BY ADVS. SMT.MINI V.MENON
OTHER PRESENT:
SRI.BIMAL K NATH-SR.GP
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.06.2024,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P.(C)NO.11713 of 2017
2
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed with the following reliefs:
“Admit. The learned Government Pleader takes notice for the first respondent. Issue notice by speed post to respondents 2 to 4.
W.P.(C)NO.11713 of 2017
3
time limit fixed for settlement of liability. This is a point to be considered in the writ petition.
submitted that the petitioner has not settled the liability even now.
W.P.(C)NO.11713 of 2017
4
petition subject to payment of the amount determined by the Bank. He did not comply with the said condition also.
Since the petitioner did not avail the benefit extended by
this Court in the above Interim Order, nothing remains to be considered. This writ petition stands dismissed.
Sd/-
M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE
Shg
W.P.(C)NO.11713 of 2017
5
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11713/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE AWARD PASSED BY THE FOURTH RESPONDENT DATED 19/12/2014 EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DATED NIL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner was entitled to the benefit of a One Time Settlement Scheme notwithstanding expiry of its time limit.
Baby.K.M
The State of Kerala rep. by the Secretary to the Government, Department of Cooperation
The Methala Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No.R-298
The Methala Service Co-operative Bank Ltd No.298 Methalapadam Branch
The Assistant Registrar of Co-operative Societies Kodungallur
M.A. Abdul Hakhim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
