Regular second appeal arising from a property suit was not pressed by the appellant's counsel at admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 13TH ASHADHA, 1946 RSA NO. 92 OF 2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 8.4.2003 IN AS NO.82 OF 1992 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS COURT (ADHOC), MANJERI ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 28.10.1991 IN OS NO.181 OF 1989 OF MUNSIFF COURT, TIRUR
APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
MULANTHALA GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR S/O. MEENAKSHI AMMA, OZHUR AMSOM, ERANALLOOR DESOM, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS. SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.) SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN (SR.) SRI.HARISH R. MENON SRI.K.JAYAKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
(IT IS RECORDED THAT FIRST RESPONDENT DEAD AND THE RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ARE RECORDED AS LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE DECEASED FIRST RESPONDENT AS PER ORDER DATED 29.05.2024 IN MEMO DATED 27.10.2018 IN RSA.NO.92/2005)
BY ADV K.RAMACHANDRAN
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA.92/2005
2
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 4th day of July, 2024
Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the appeal
is not pressed. Hence the second appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
C. PRATHEEP KUMAR, JUDGE
sou.
Mulanthala Gopalakrishnan Nair
Kodiyeri Meenakshikutty Amma (died; legal representatives recorded)
Sasikumar
Geetha
C. Pratheep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
