K.a.Balabhadran v. a.Ajidas
Case brief
What is this about?
A regular second appeal concerning a property dispute was found to have become infructuous; the court dismissed it on that basis without adjudicating any substantive legal question.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.PRATHEEP KUMAR
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 14TH ASHADHA, 1946
RSA NO. 719 OF 2015
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.02.2015 IN AS NO.160 OF 2009 OF DISTRICT COURT, PALAKKAD ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.01.2009 IN OS NO.109 OF 2004 OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, PALAKKAD
APPELLANT/1ST APPELLANT/2 ND PLAINTIFF:
K.A.BALABHADRAN
AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.APPUKUTTAN, KUNNUKATTIL, THENKURUSSI AMSOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD.
BY ADVS. SRI.V.V.ASOKAN (SR.) SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER SRI.P.RAHUL
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 & 2 AND APPELLANTS 2-6 IN
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.A.Balabhadran
- respondent
A.Ajidas
- respondent
A.Sivalingappa Gowder
- respondent
L.Lakshmidevi
- respondent
Maheswari
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court