The Director of General Education v. Sreerekha
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge court closed the contempt case and review petition because the interim order of the underlying writ petition was already set aside in a subsequent appeal. No further emergency order or hearing was permitted.
What did the court decide?
The contempt case is closed. The review petition is also closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2845 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED06.11.2023 IN WP(C) NO.35680 OF 2023 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SREELEKHA AGED 36 YEARS W/O.NARAYANAN, PAYOOR MANA, SANTHI SADAN, ATHALOOR P.O., THAVANOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 679573
BY ADVS.
BABU S. NAIR SMITHA BABU
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
HAIDRALI P.V.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt case and review petition require hearing in light of the interim order being set aside.
Whether the review proceeding should be closed after the underlying interim order is no longer in force.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SREELEKHA
- respondent
HAIDRALI P.V.
- other
SMT. S.L. SYLAJA.
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
- respondent
ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER EDAPPAL
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court