Dismissed
Vijayan v. District Geologist
Kerala HCRP/353/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Review petition against a writ judgment; counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition was not being pressed, and the court dismissed the review petition as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
None; review petition dismissed as not pressed at the request of counsel.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
¶4
FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF MAY 2024 / 3RD JYAISHTA, 1946
¶5
RP NO. 353 OF 2024
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.01.2024 IN WP(C) NO.39956 OF 2022 OF HIGH
¶7
COURT OF KERALA
¶8
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
¶9
VIJAYAN, AGED 70 YEARS
KANDANKULANGARA HOUSE, VELLITHIRUTHI,
MARUNTHANCODE P.O, THRISSUR,
KERALA, PIN - 680604
¶10
BY ADV K.MOHAMMED RAFEEQ
¶11
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS:
¶12
1 DISTRICT GEOLOGIST
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Vijayan
- respondent
District Geologist
- respondent
Chowannur Grama Panchayat
- respondent
Secretary, Chowannur Grama Panchayat
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court