Disposed

Anita Gopinadhan v. Harshil R Meena IAS

Kerala HC23 May 2024Con.Case(C)/652/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt proceedings arising from a writ petition judgment. Both sides reported that the directions in the earlier judgment had been complied with. The court dispensed with the respondent's personal appearance after reviewing the affidavit explaining the delay and closed the contempt case.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; respondent's personal appearance dispensed with.

Anita Gopinadhan Vs Harshil R Meena IAS — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF MAY 2024 / 2ND JYAISHTA, 1946

¶5

CON.CASE(C) NO. 652 OF 2024

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.37525 OF 2023 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA

¶7

PETITIONER/PETITONER:

¶8

ANITA GOPINADHAN

¶9

AGED 62 YEARS W/O GOPINADHAN ARCADIA ,
T.C - 5/ 2568 (4) SASTHAMANGALAM SASTHAMANGALAM P.O ,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695010
BY ADVS. P.K.SOYUZ E.V.BABYCHAN

¶10

RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT NO.1:

¶11

HARSHIL R MEENA IAS (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO
THE PETITIONER) THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER / SUB
COLLECTOR , KOZHIKODE RDO OFFICE, CIVIL STATION ,
ERANHIPPALAM P.O KOZHIKODE, PIN - 673020
BY SR.GP -DEEPA NARAYANAN

¶12

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 23.05.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:

¶13

Con.Case (C) No. 652 of 2024 : 2 :

¶14

VIJU ABRAHAM , J.

¶15

=========================== Con.Case (C) No. 652 of 2024 in

¶16

WP(C) No.37525 of 2023

¶17

============================ Dated this the 23^rd day of May, 2024

¶18

J U D G M E N T

¶19

When the matter was taken up for consideration, both sides

¶20

submit that the direction in the judgment has been complied with.

¶21

The learned Government Pleader submits that an affidavit has been filed explaining the delay in complying with the direction within the time limit granted by this Court, and seeking for dispensation of personal appearance of the respondent which is ordered as per order dated 12.04.2024.

¶22

After going through the affidavit and the submission made by the learned Government Pleader, I am inclined to dispense with the personal appearance of the respondent since the directions have been complied with.

¶23

Accordingly, the above contempt of Court case is closed.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE

¶26

sbk/-

¶27

Con.Case (C) No. 652 of 2024 : 3 :

¶28

APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 652/2024

¶29

PETITIONER ANNEXURES

¶30

Annexure ICERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE HIGH
COURT OF KERALA IN W.P.C NO. 37525 OF 2023 DATED
14.11.2023

¶31

Annexure IIA TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD
DATED 28.11.2023

Anita Gopinadhan v. Harshil R Meena IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anita Gopinadhan v. Harshil R Meena IAS

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

L Seetha Lekshmi Vs Sri. C.C. Krishna Kumar

P.a.Nadirsha, Vs State of Kerala

Ahamed Riyas Vs Divisonal Forest Officer,Malayatoor

R. Kamalavathy Vs the Additional Chief Secretary (Revenue)

K. M. Shamsudheen Vs State of Kerala

Akhil Shaji Vs Jayamohan v