Review petition listed for admission with no representation for the petitioner; the court closed the review petition as apparently infructuous, leaving the petitioner free to seek restoration if the cause of action survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1945
RP NO. 301 OF 1995
REVIEW PETITIONER:
P.RADHAMMA
BY ADV SRI.V.DIVAKARAN POTTI
RESPONDENT:
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD
SRI.PREMCHAND R.NAIR, SR.GP
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.P.No.301/1995
..2..
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
R.P. No. 301 of 1995
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 18th day of March, 2024
O R D E R
There is no representation for the petitioner. Obviously, the matter would have become infructuous. The Review Petition is accordingly
closed, without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to seek restoration
in case the cause of action, as alleged in the petition, still survives.
Sd/-
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P. JUDGE
APA
P.Radhamma
Travancore Devaswom Board
Mohammed Nias C.P.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
