Ratnam v. Alice
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC challenging an order in RSA No.720 of 2020 was dismissed as devoid of merits due to no apparent error found on the face of the order.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed as devoid of merits with no apparent error on the face of the order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1946
RP NO. 1 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 13/11/2023 IN RSA NO.720 OF 2020 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONERS/ADDL. APPELLANTS 1 AND 2:
1 RATNAM
AGED 81 YEARS
W/O PUTHENVEETTIL RAGHAVAN, H.NO.1/301,VELAPPAYA ROAD, CANALPALAM, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK.(DIED LEGAL HEIRS IMPLEADED), PIN - 680581
2 SHEEJA P.R ALIAS RUGMINI AGED 51 YEARS
D/O LATE RAGHAVADAS, PUTHENVEETTIL HOUSE, KODUVELI
LANE, VELAPPAYA, M.G KAVU P.O, THRISSUR DISTRICT,
PIN - 680581
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petition has any merit given the absence of apparent error in the impugned order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RATNAM
- petitioner
SHEEJA P.R ALIAS RUGMINI
- petitioner
RAVIKUMAR P.R
- respondent
ALICE
- respondent
SANTHOSH
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court