Fazid v. Xxx
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed this revision petition challenging an order refusing discharge. Holding the impugned order sufficiently reasoned and the prima facie case established, the Court found the petition meritless. The petitioners are to face trial.
What did the court decide?
Revision Petition dismissed; petitioners to undergo trial.
What the court decided
1
CRL.REV.PET NO. 666 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1946
CRL.REV.PET NO. 666 OF 2023
CRIME NO.91/2019 OF Irinjalakuda Police Station, Thrissur
AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRL.M.P.NO.4176/2023 IN CC NO.1375 OF
2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,IRINJALAKUDA
REVISION PETITIONERS:
1 FAZID
AGED 32 YEARS
S/O MUHAMMED FAISAL, PALAYAMKOTT HOUSE,
KUTTANGACHIRA-SURABHI NAGAR, IRINJALAKUDA, PIN -
680121
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the discharge petition is a valid reasoned order under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C.
Whether the petitioners satisfy the substantive requirements for discharge under Section 227 Cr.P.C.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
FAZID
- petitioner
MUHAMMED FAISAL
- petitioner
FAZIL
- petitioner
MUMTAZ
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court