Regular first appeal by the defendant against a Sub Court, Ottappalam judgment. Counsel reported no instructions from the party; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1945
RFA (INDIGENT) NO. 708 OF 2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.03.2013 IN OS NO.149 OF 2008 OF SUB COURT, OTTAPPALAM
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
GOPI MOHANAN AGED 57, S/O.KOLLAYIL KRISHNANEZHUTHASSAN, THIRUVEGAPURA AMSOM, CHEMBRA DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. BY ADV SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF:
RFA (INDIGENT) NO.708/13
-: 2 :-
6 ASHRAF AGED 46 YEARS D/O.KUNHIPPA, EACHARATHVALAPIL HOUSE, THRITHALA AMSOM, NHANGATTIRI DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 7 NAJMA AGED 39 YEARS D/O.KUNHIPPA, EACHARATHVALAPIL HOUSE, THRITHALA AMSOM, NHANGATTIRI DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 8 NASAR AGED 37 YEARS S/O.KUNHIPPA, EACHARATHVALAPIL HOUSE, THRITHALA AMSOM, NHANGATTIRI DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. 9 BASHEER AGED 42 YEARS S/O.KUNHIPPA, EACHARATHVALAPIL HOUSE, THRITHALA AMSOM, NHANGATTIRI DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. [THE LEGAL HEIRS OF DECEASED SOLE RESPONDENT ARE IMPLEADED AS ADDL. RESPONDENTS 2 TO 9 VIDE ORDER DATED 20/02/2024 IN I.A.NO.1/2019]. BY ADVS. SRI.R.SREEHARI R.SREEHARI SACHIN VYAS
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 20.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Sathish Ninan, J.
=================================
R.F.A.(Indigent) No.708 of 2013
=================================
Dated this the 20th day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant submits
that there is no instructions from the party.
Hence this appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
Sathish Ninan, Judge
SVP
Gopi Mohanan
Kunhippa
Kunjimma
Safiya
Sainaba
Afsath
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
