Abdul Kalam v. Farook
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit dispute settled out of court between the parties; Regular First Appeal disposed of in terms of a compromise petition filed with the court.
What did the court decide?
Appeal disposed as per settlement; refund of court fee on the appeal memorandum to appellant.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 30TH PHALGUNA, 1945
RFA NO. 211 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 26.06.2023 IN OS NO.425 OF 2007 OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE (ADDL), PALAKKAD
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
ABDUL KALAM AGED 56 YEARS S/O MUHAMMED HANEEFA, RESIDING AT KAMBRATHUCHALLA, MUTHALAMADA AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD - 678507
BY ADVS. P.R.VENKATESH LAKSHMI MEENAKSHI P.R.
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
FAROOK AGED 51 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED MOIDEEN, RESIDING AT CHULLIYARMEDU, MUTHALAMADA AMSOM, CHITTUR TALUK, PALAKKAD - 678507
BY ADVS. BINOY VASUDEVAN R.MANIKANTAN(M-697)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Abdul Kalam
- respondent
Farook
Coram
Sathish Ninan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court