Disposed
Vimala v. Ravindran
Kerala HCRFA/175/2004
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Regular first appeal settled out of court between the parties; the court disposed of the appeal as settled, ordered refund of the court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal following Supreme Court precedent, and closed pending interlocutory applications.
What did the court decide?
Refund of court fee paid on the memorandum of appeal to the appellant; appeal disposed as settled out of court; IAs closed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
¶4
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 22ND CHAITHRA, 1946
¶5
RFA NO. 175 OF 2004 (F)
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.10.2003 IN OS NO.58 OF
2002 OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE’S COURT, NEYYATTINKARA
APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
¶7
VIMALA
D/O GLADSTON, AGED 50 YEARS,
ROSEMOUNT, NELLIMOODU, VENPAKAL.
BY ADV SRI.R.S.KALKURA
¶8
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
¶9
RAVINDRAN
S/O THANKAPPAN, VELLIYOOR, VENGANOOR.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.JAMES VINCENT
SRI.TERRY V.JAMES
¶10
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON
11.04.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
¶11
RFA NO. 175 OF 2004
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Vimala D/o Gladston
- respondent
Ravindran S/o Thankappan
Coram
AI extract
Shoba Annamma Eapen
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court