Dismissed
Viswambal v. Rani
Kerala HCRFA/808/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal against a decree of the Subordinate Judge, Palakkad. Counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating the appeal was not pressed; the High Court recorded the memo and dismissed the Regular First Appeal as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHOBA ANNAMMA EAPEN
¶4
MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL 2024 / 19TH CHAITHRA, 1946
¶5
RFA NO. 808 OF 2015
¶6
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 04.06.2015 IN OS NO.446 OF 2010
¶7
OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE (ADDL), PALAKKAD
¶8
APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFF:
¶9
1VISWAMBAL
¶10
AGED 60 YEARS (DIED)
¶11
D/O.MENNAKSHIYAMMAL, 10/246, IDAYAR LANE, PIRIVUSALA,
MARUTHAROAD, PALAKKAD.
¶12
SUPPL.
SANTHI, W/O BABURAJ, EURAN, PANVEL,
APPELLANT
MAHARASHTRA – 400 702
2
SUPPL.
SUMATHI, AGED 44 YEARS, D/O VISWAMBAL, MEENA NILAYAM,
APPELLANT
NALLEPPILLY, CHITTUR, PALAKKAD – 678 553
3
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Viswambal (deceased), through legal heirs Santhi and Sumathi
- respondent
Rani
- respondent
Raji
- respondent
Vijayan
- respondent
Radhakrishnan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court