Regular first appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; notice to respondents returned unserved, counsel relinquished vakalath, and no steps were taken or representation for the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
THURSDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 1ST CHAITHRA, 1946
RFA NO. 157 OF 2022
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.01.2015 IN OS NO.196 OF 2010 OF SUB COURT, VADAKARA APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
PARAMMEL JAYASEELAN, AGED 61 YEARS
S/O.GOPALAN, FISHERMAN, RESIDING AT PANDIKASALA, PARAKKAL, MAHE, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VRINDAVANAM, AZHIYITTAVALAPIL, P.O.MAHE, PIN-673 310.
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
R.F.A.No.157 of 2022
-: 2 :-
W/O.BALAN, RESIDING AT ELAKUNIYIL, AZHIYUR AMSOM, DESOM, VATAKRA THALUK, PIN-673 309.
7 MALATHI, AGED 48 YEARS W/O.BABU, RESIDING AT KALLUVAYIL, AZHIYUR AMSOM, DESOM, VATAKARA THALUK, PIN-673 309.
8 VISWANATHAN, AGED 46 YEARS S/O.MADHAVI, RESIDING AT CHERUVATHUM KANDY, NADEMMAL, AZHIYUR AMSOM DESOM, VATAKARA THALUK, PIBN-673 309.
9 USHA, AGED 44 YEARS W/O.VIJAYAN, RESIDING AT VADESWARATH THAZHAKUNIYIL, CHOKLI AMSOM, MENAPURAM DESOM, MANAPURAM, THALASSERY THALUK, PIN-688 558.
10 SUMANGALA, AGED 42 YEARS D/O.MADHAVI, RESIDING AT CHERUVATHUM KANDY, NADEMMAL, AZHIYUR AMSOM, DESOM, VATAKARA THALUK, PIN-673 309.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.F.A.No.157 of 2022
-: 3 :-
Sathish Ninan, J.
==============================
R.F.A.No.157 of 2022
==========================
Dated this the 21st day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
Notice issued to respondents 1 and 2 were
returned as 'expired'. On 28/02/2024, this Court
had directed the appellant to take steps and the case was listed to 19/03/2024. On that day, the
counsel submitted that he has relinquished the vakalath.
is no representation for the appellant.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/- Sathish Ninan, Judge
rsr
Parammel Jayaseelan
K.K. Sukumaran
Madhavi
M.K. Kousu
Radha
Padmini
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
