Navas v. Abdul Jaleel
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed the petitioners application for issuance of Commission to note existence of a pathway. It set aside the lower court order dismissing it as belated, permitting the application subject to payment of costs to the first respondent.
What did the court decide?
Application for issuance of commission allowed subject to payment of Rs 5,000 cost to 1st respondent.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 4TH PHALGUNA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 295 OF 2024
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OS 190/2020 OF MUNSIFF MAGISTRATE
COURT,PONNANI
PETITIONER/APPLICANTS IN I.A./DEFENDATNS 3 TO 5 IN SUIT:
- 1 NAVAS
AGED 42 YEARS S/O VADASSERI ALI, RESIDING AT PURANGU AMSOM AND DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, PURANGU P.O., MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679584 2 NASAR AGED 41 YEARS
S/O VADASSERI ALI RESIDING AT PURANGU AMSOM AND DESOM, PONNANI TALUK, PURANGU P.O., MALAPPURAM, PIN - 679584 3 FOUSIYA AGED 39 YEARS
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for issuance of Commission, being part of written statements, satisfies the requirements of Order 26 Rule 17 CPC
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Navas
- petitioner
Nasar
- petitioner
Fousiya
- respondent
Abdul Jaleel
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court