The High Court of Kerala disposed of Original Petition No. 263 of 2019 without delivering a substantive judgment. The Court recorded that the petitioner and respondents had amicably settled the subject matter of the suit, leading to the disposal of the petition.
The original petition was disposed of as the parties had reached a consensus on the subject matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 3RD PHALGUNA, 1945
OP(C) NO. 263 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OS 1029/2014 OF II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF:
ABDUL KAREEM AGED 58 YEARS S/O.MOOSA, THOPPIL PONNANTHARA HOUSE, KAKKANAD - 682 030. BY ADVS. A.T.ANILKUMAR SMT.V.SHYLAJA
RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT:
1 P.R.DANAVAN (DIED) AGED 56 YEARS S/O.RAJAPPAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANOOR, CHOWARA P.O. - 683 571.
ADDL.2 SUJA, AGED 56 YEARS W/O P.R. DANAVAN,PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANOOR , CHOWARA.P.O, 683 571
ADDL.3 ARUN SAGAR S/O P.R. DANAVAN, ,PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANOOR , CHOWARA.P.O, 683571
ADDL.4 AMRUTHA D/O. LATE P.R. DANAVAN, PARAMBATHERIL HOUSE, NEDUVANOOR, CHOWARA., 683 571 ADDL. R2 TO R4 IMPLEDED AS THE LR'S OF THE RESPONDENT VIDE ORDER DTD 19.02.2024 IN I.A.NO.1/2024 BY ADVS. SRI.K.R.VINOD SMT.M.S.LETHA
THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22.02.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
O.P.(C).No. 263 of 2019
J U D G M E N T
Dated this the 22nd day of February, 2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of this Original Petition, as also the suit O.S.No.1029/2014, has been settled amicably by and between the parties.
2. This submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is endorsed by the learned counsel for the respondents. Learned counsel for the
respondent also have no objection in treating the document Ext.P1 as a license arrangement, in which case it is to be treated as an agreement and not as a bond.
The submission made by the learned counsel
O.P.(C).No. 263 of 2019
..3..
appearing for both sides are recorded. Inasmuch as, the parties have arrived at a consensus as regards the subject matter of this Original Petition, the same will stand disposed of accordingly.
Sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE
TR
O.P.(C).No. 263 of 2019
..4..
APPENDIX OF OP(C) 263/2019
PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT DATED 5/3/2013. EXHIBIT P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT IN O.S.NO.1029/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE WRITTEN STATEMENT IN OS NO.1029/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM. EXHIBIT P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN OS NO.1029/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 10/1/2019.
ABDUL KAREEM
1 P.R.DANAVAN
ADDL.2 SUJA
ADDL.3 ARUN SAGAR
ADDL.4 AMRUTHA
C. JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
