Dismissed

Sunil v. Sudheer

Kerala HC5 Jan 2024OP(C)/2869/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Original petition arising out of a pending suit at Munsiff Court, Kodungallur, involving advocate commissioner appointment and commission report matters. Counsel stated the subject matter had been settled between the parties and sought withdrawal; the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

What the court decided

AI extract

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2024 / 15TH POUSHA, 1945

¶4

OP(C) NO. 2869 OF 2023

¶5

AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT OS 2936/2014 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KODUNGALLUR

¶6

PETITIONER/PETITIONER/DEFENDANT:

¶7

SUNIL

¶8

AGED 54 YEARS

¶9

S/O KAITHAMANAKKAL KATTIPURAKKAL VEETIL SUPRAN,
METHALA VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK, PIN - 680664
BY ADV MANSOOR ALI

¶10

RESPONDENTS / RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:

¶11

1SUDHEER
AGED 51 YEARS

¶12

Sunil Vs Sudheer — Property and Title | Kerala HC (2024)

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the subject matter of this Original Petition has
been settled by and between the parties and that
this Original Petition may be therefore, permitted
to be withdrawn. The submission of the learned
counsel is recorded and this Original Petition is
accordingly dismissed, as withdrawn.

¶24

`PETITIO`	`NER’S EX`	`HIBITS`
`Exhibit`	`P1`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORIGINAL PLAINT IN` `O.S. NO. 2936/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE` `HON'BLE MUNSIFF'S COURT, KODUNGALLUR`
`Exhibit`	`P2`	`A TRUE COPY OF I.A. NO.2206/ 2018 SEEKING` `TO APPOINT THE ADVOCATE COMMISIONER`
`Exhibit`	`P3`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE WORK MEMO DATED` `09/07/2019 FILED BY THE` `PETITIONER/DEFENDANT BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S` `COURT KODUNGALLUR`
`Exhibit`	`P4`	`A TRUE COPY OF WORK MEMO FILED BY THE` `RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS BEFORE THE` `MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR ON 23.09.2019`
`Exhibit`	`P5`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSION REPORT` `DATED 20/01/2022, ALONG WITH THE SURVEY` `SKETCH, FILED BY THE ADVOCATE` `COMMISSIONER IN I.A NO. 2206/2018 IN O.S` `NO. 2936/2014 ON THE FILE OF HON'BLE` `MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR`
`Exhibit`	`P6`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO. 3942/1992` `OF KODUNGALLUR SRO`
`Exhibit`	`P7`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE I.A NO. 02/2022 FILED` `BY THE PETITIONER/DEFENDANT BEFORE THE` `MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR`
`Exhibit`	`P8`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED` `14.02.2022 FILED BY THE` `RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS BEFORE THE` `MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR`
`Exhibit`	`P9`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE I.A NO. 3/2022 FILED` `BY THE RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS BEFORE THE` `MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR`
`Exhibit`	`P10`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 08.04.2022` `PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR` `IN I.A NO. 3/2022 IN O.S NO.2936/2014`
`Exhibit`	`P11`	`A TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDED PLAINT FILED` `BY THE RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS BEFORE THE` `MUNSIFF'S COURT KODUNGALLUR`

¶27

Exhibit P12A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 14.08.2023
PASSED BY THE MUNSIFF'S COURT,
KODUNGALLUR IN I.A NO. 2/2022 IN O.S
NO.2936/2014
Exhibit P13A TRUE COPY OF THE BUILDING TAX RECEIPT
NO.86022 DATED 11.04.2023 ISSUED BY THE
KODUNGALLUR MUNICIPALITY WITH RESPECT TO
THE BUILDING NO.18/394 BELONGING TO
PETITIONER/DEFENDANT

Sunil v. Sudheer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdulla Vs Moideenkutty

M.P.Suhara Vs C.Suhara

Shaji Vs Babu

Haris Vs Sreekrishna Vilasom Chitty Fund

Vinithambika Vs Nil

Sunil v. Sudheer

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdulla Vs Moideenkutty

M.P.Suhara Vs C.Suhara

Shaji Vs Babu

Haris Vs Sreekrishna Vilasom Chitty Fund

Vinithambika Vs Nil

A compact analysis

S. Radhakrishnan Vs State of Kerala