Anitha Anand v. Gita Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil revision petition concerning property dispute; counsel submitted the subject matter had become infructuous. The submission was recorded and the petition was dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2024 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1945
CRP NO. 385 OF 2016
IN O.S. NO.1033/2012 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF'S COURT, ERNAKULAM
REVISION PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 ANITHA ANAND W/O HRIDAYANANDA KUMAR, AGED 58 YEARS, RESIDING AT 1ST FLOOR, SOUBHAGYA, AMMANCHERI LANE, EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILAGE, MAMANGALAM, COCHIN-682 025.
2 HRIDAYANANDA KUMAR AGED 66 YEARS, S/O T.SKUMARAN HRIDAYANANDA KUMAR, RESIDING AT 1ST FLOOR, SOUBHAGYA, AMMANCHERI LANE, EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILAGE, MAMANGALAM, COCHIN-682 025.
BY ADVS. SRI.K.B.DAYAL SRI.SIBI KARUN
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anitha Anand
- petitioner
Hridayananda Kumar
- respondent
Gita Pillai
- respondent
A.S.Pillai
- respondent
Sabitha S. Vardhame
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court