Contempt petition alleging non-implementation of a writ court order regarding the petitioner, a school teacher. On being informed that orders had been issued, the court closed the contempt case without prejudice to her right to challenge those orders.
Contempt case closed; liberty reserved to challenge the newly issued orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 2ND CHAITHRA, 1946
CON.CASE(C) NO. 507 OF 2024
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 27.11.2023 IN WP(C) NO.39387 OF 2023 OF
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
SMITHA G
AGED 50 YEARS
WIFE OF R. PRASANTH, HIGH SCHOOL TEACHER (HINDI),
GANAPATHY VILASAM HIGH SCHOOL, KOOVAPPADY,
PERUMBAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN – 683 544
BY ADV V.A.MUHAMMED
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
SRI. M.D. MURALI
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM @ KAKKANAD,
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN – 682 030
SMT. S. L. SYLAJA. GP.
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR
ADMISSION ON 22.03.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
CON.CASE(C) NO. 507 OF 2024
IN WP(C) NO.39387 OF 2023
2
T.R.RAVI.J
Contempt Case (C) No.507 of 2024
in
WP(C) No.39387 of 2023
Dated this the 22nd day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
When the case is taken up, it is submitted that orders
have been issued.
In the above circumstances, the contempt case is closed
without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge
the orders now issued.
Sd/-
T.R.RAVI
JUDGE
sn
SMITHA G
SRI. M.D. MURALI
T.R.RAVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court