Dismissed
Ramadas v. K.Sethumadhavan
Kerala HCAS/446/1998
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal and cross objection against a 1998 decree were dismissed because the appellant took no steps to implead the legal heirs of the deceased fourth respondent.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
¶4
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1945
¶5
AS NO. 446 OF 1998 AND CO IN AS NO.446 OF 1998
¶6
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.03.1998 IN OS NO.174
¶7
OF 1989 OF SUBORDINATE JUDGE COURT, OTTAPPALAM
¶8
APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS 7,11,12 & 13:
¶9
- 1 RAMADAS S/O.LATE APPU EZHUTHASSAN, RESIDING AT KOTHAKURUSSI AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
¶10
- 2 MALINI, W/O.4TH DEFENDANT-APPU EZHUTHASSAN(LATE) RESIDING AT KOTHAKURUSSI AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
¶11
- 3 PRASAD S/O.MALIN 4TH DEFENDANT -APPU EZHUTHASSAN(LATE) RESIDING AT KOTHAKURUSSI AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
¶12
- 4 SUDHEER S/O.MALINI AND 4TH DEFENDANT -APPU EZHUTHASSAN(LATE) RESIDING AT KOTHAKURUSSI AMSOM DESOM, OTTAPALAM TALUK.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Ramadas
- appellant
Malini
- appellant
Prasad
- appellant
Sudheer
- respondent
K.Sethumadhavan
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court