Appeal suits against judgments in property disputes between the parties; counsel reported no instructions from the party. The High Court dismissed both cases for non-prosecution, deciding nothing on the merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1945
AS NO. 306 OF 1998
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.03.1997 IN OS NO.982 OF 1995 OF SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF:
RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:
AS NO.306/98 & RSA NO.739/04
-: 2 :-
PERAKAM AMSOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, TRICHUR.
W/O. P. KESAVAN, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.
SRI.K.B.GANGESH-R1
THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 04.03.2024, ALONG WITH RSA.739/2004, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS NO.306/98 & RSA NO.739/04
-: 3 :-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATHISH NINAN
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 14TH PHALGUNA, 1945
RSA NO. 739 OF 2004
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.09.2003 IN AS NO.6 OF 2003 WITH CROSS APPEAL OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
22.09.1998 IN OS NO.333 OF 1995 OF MUNSIFF COURT,
CHAVAKKAD
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 3/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 3:
AS NO.306/98 & RSA NO.739/04
-: 4 :-
I.A NO.169/10.]
BY ADV SRI.P.V.CHANDRA MOHAN
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS 1 TO 6/RESPONDENTS 4 TO
6/PLAINTIFFS 1 TO 6/DEFENDANTS 4 TO 6:
| 1 | SAKTHIDHARAN, S/O MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, PERAKAM AMSOM, KARAYOORU DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT. |
|---|---|
| 2 | SHANMUGHAN |
| S/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, RESIDING AT, MATTAM VILLAGE, NAMBAZHIKKAD DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK. |
|
| 3 | PARAMESWARAN |
| S/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, RESIDING AT PORKULAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT. |
|
| 4 | PURUSHOTHAMAN |
| S/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, RESIDING AT PORKULAM VILLAGE AND DESOM, THALAPPILLY TALUK, TRICHUR DISTRICT. |
|
| 5 | RAVEENDRAN |
| S/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, RESIDING AT PERAKAM AMSOM, KARAYOORU DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. |
|
| 6 | DAKSHAYANI |
| D/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, RESIDING AT, PERAKAM AMSOM, KARAYOORU DESOM, CHAVAKKAD TALUK |
|
| 7 | BALAKRISHNAN |
| S/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, C/O. | |
| P.R.KESAVAN, MACHINERY CONSULTANT, PATEL ROAD, COIMBATORE-9. |
|
| 8 | SANKARANARAYANAN |
| S/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, C/O. ASOKA | |
| AUTOMOBILES, KUDAK. | |
| 9 | CHANDRIKA D/O. MANATHALA KARUVAN RAMAN, W/O. P.KESAVAN, POOJAPPURA, TRIVANDRUM. |
| R1- BY ADV SRI.K.B.GANGESH | |
| THIS REG | ULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION |
| ON 04.03 SAME DAY |
.2024, ALONG WITH AS.306/1998, THE COURT ON THE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
Sathish Ninan, J.
=============================================
AS No.306 of 1998 and R.S.A.No.739 of 2004
==============================================
Dated this the 4th day of March, 2024
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit
that there is no instructions from the party.
Hence these cases are dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
Sathish Ninan, Judge
SVP
Chandrasekharan
K.P Chandrika
Ajayakumar K.P
Anandkumar K.P
Amrathkumar K.P
Sakthidharan
Sathish Ninan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
