Dismissed

Trivandrum Club, v. G. Chandrakumar

Kerala HC14 Mar 2023WP(C)/82/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writers petitioners challenged a common labour court order quashing domestic enquiries against eight workers of Trivandrum Club. The court upheld the quashing order, declining interference as the enquiry was found defective and perverse, reserving the right to challenge the preliminary order with the final award.

What did the court decide?

Rejection of writ petitions challenging the common labour court order quashing the domestic enquiry proceedings.

Trivandrum Club, Vs G. Chandrakumar — Arbitration | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶4

THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICERAJAVIJAYARAGHAVANV
TUESDAY,THE14THDAYOFMARCH2023/23RDPHALGUNA,1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 82 OF 2021

¶6

PETITIONER/S:

¶7

TRIVANDRUMCLUB,
VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN695010
REPRESENTEDBYITSHONOURARYSECRETARYTOSANTHOSH
KUMAR
BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶8

RESPONDENT/S:

¶9

1G.CHANDRAKUMAR,
POOVANVILAKATHUMADAM,INDUSTRIALESTATEP.O,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695019
2LABOURCOURT,
KOLLAM,PIN691013
BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU

¶10

SMTDEEPAV,GP

¶11

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).155/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶12

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶13

& connected cases

¶14

¶15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT

¶16

THEHONOURABLEMR.JUSTICERAJAVIJAYARAGHAVANV
TUESDAY,THE14THDAYOFMARCH2023/23RDPHALGUNA,1944

¶17

WP(C) NO. 155 OF 2021

¶18

PETITIONER/S:

¶19

TRIVANDRUMCLUB
VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695010,
REPRESENTEDBYITSHONORARYSECRETARYD.SANTHOSH
KUMAR.

¶20

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶21

RESPONDENT/S:

¶22

1T.MADHU,
TC8/1796,LEKSHMINAGAR,TIRUMALAPO,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695006.

¶23

2LABOURCOURT,
KOLLAM,PIN-691013.
BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU
SMT.MABLECKURIAN,SRGP

¶24

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶25

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶26

¶27

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944

¶28

WP(C) NO. 509 OF 2021

¶29

PETITIONER/S:

¶30

TRIVANDRUMCLUB,VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695010,REPRESENTEDBYITS
HONORARYSECRETARYD.SANTHOSHKUMAR.

¶31

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶32

RESPONDENT/S:

¶33

1VISHNUM,
KAVUVILAKEEZHEVEEDU,OOKODU,NEMOM,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695020
2LABOURCOURT,
KOLLAM,PIN-691013
BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU
SMT.MABLECKURIAN,SRGP

¶34

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶35

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶36

¶37

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944

¶38

WP(C) NO. 496 OF 2021

¶39

PETITIONER/S:

¶40

TRIVANDRUMCLUB
VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695010,
REPRESENTEDBYITSHONORARYSECRETARYD.SANTHOSH
KUMAR.

¶41

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶42

RESPONDENT/S:

¶43

1RAJUP.
SALOMNIVAS,ARA40,KUNNAPPUZHA,ARAMADAP.O.,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695032.

¶44

2LABOURCOURT
KOLLAM,PIN-691013.
BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU
SMT.DEEPAV,GP

¶45

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶46

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶47

¶48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944

¶49

WP(C) NO. 497 OF 2021

¶50

PETITIONER/S:

¶51

TRIVANDRUMCLUB
VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN695010,
REP.BYITSHONORARYSECRETARYD.SANTHOSHKUMAR

¶52

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶53

RESPONDENT/S:

¶54

1TOMYJOSEPH
KANAKANIVAS,TC17/561,PRA180,CHADIYARA,
POOJAPPURAPO,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695012

¶55

2LABOURCOURT
KOLLAM,PIN691013
BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU
SMT.MABLECKURIAN,SRGP

¶56

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶57

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶58

¶59

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944

¶60

WP(C) NO. 489 OF 2021

¶61

PETITIONER/S:

¶62

TRIVANDRUMCLUB
VAZHUCAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695010.
REPRESENTEDBYITSHONORARYSECRETARYDSANTHOSH
KUMAR.

¶63

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)

¶64

RESPONDENT/S:

¶65

1S.BINU
BSBHAVAN,THENNOOR,VELAYANI,NEMOMPO,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695020.

¶66

2 LABOUR COURT KOLLAM, PIN-691013.

¶67

BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU

¶68

SMT.MABLECKURIAN,SRGP

¶69

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶70

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶71

¶72

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944

¶73

WP(C)NO.285OF2021

¶74

PETITIONER/S:

¶75

TRIVANDRUMCLUB
VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN695010,
REP.BYITSHONORARYSECRETARYD.SANTHOSHKUMAR

¶76

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶77

RESPONDENT/S:

¶78

1KUMARIMRIDULA
THEKKEVILAVEEDU,TC-17/386,CHADIYARA,
POOJAPPURAPO,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695012

¶79

2LABOURCOURT
KOLLAM,PIN691013
BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU
SMT.MABLECKURIAN,SRGP

¶80

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶81

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶82

¶83

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V TUESDAY, THE 14^TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 23RD PHALGUNA, 1944

¶84

WP(C) NO. 318 OF 2021

¶85

PETITIONER/S:

¶86

TRIVANDRUMCLUB
VAZHUTHACAUD,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM,PIN-695010,
REPRESENTEDBYITSHONORARYSECRETARYDSANTHODH
KUMAR.

¶87

BYADVS.
P.RAMAKRISHNAN
SMT.PREETHIRAMAKRISHNAN(P-212)
SRI.T.C.KRISHNA
SRI.C.ANILKUMAR
SMT.ASHAK.SHENOY
SRI.PRATAPABRAHAMVARGHESE

¶88

RESPONDENT/S:

¶89

1R.PRADEEPKUMAR
MOLANAN,TC6/1256,MARUTHAMKUZHI,
KANJIRAMPARAPO,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695030.

¶90

2 LABOUR COURT KOLLAM, PIN-691013.

¶91

BYADVS.
SRI.GOPAKUMARR.THALIYAL
SRI.M.S.VIJAYACHANDRAABABU

¶92

SMT.DEEPAV,GP

¶93

THISWRITPETITION(CIVIL)HAVINGCOMEUPFORADMISSION
ON14.03.2023,ALONGWITHWP(C).82/2021ANDCONNECTEDCASES,
THECOURTONTHESAMEDAYDELIVEREDTHEFOLLOWING:

¶94

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶95

¶96

JUDGMENT

¶97

[WP(C) Nos.82/2021, 155/2021, 509/2021, 496/2021, 497/2021, 489/2021, 285/2021 & 318/2021]

¶98

The petitioner herein is a society registered under the Travancore Cochin Literary and Scientific Charitable Societies Act, 1955. All these writ petitions have been preferred challenging the common order dated 19.11.2020 passed by the Labour Court, Kollam, by which the Labour Court, after holding that the domestic enquiry conducted against the workmen was defective, perverse and without evidence, quashed the enquiry proceedings.

¶99

The records reveal that the workers were all employed in the Trivandrum Club, the petitioner herein. Separate memos were issued raising various misconducts against the workers. The workmen responded to the show cause notices and being dissatisfied with the explanation offered, a domestic enquiry was ordered to be conducted by the very same enquiry officer. The enquiry officer submitted a report finding the workmen guilty of misconduct. The workmen raised separate disputes challenging the report of the enquiry officer before the Labour Court.

¶100

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶101

¶102

The Labour Court after considering the facts and circumstances

¶103

came to the conclusion that the enquiry officer, instead of conducting enquiry into the 12 charges levelled against the workmen and without arriving at a finding separately, failed to answer each issue framed by him separately. It was held that the 12 charges were converted into issues to the prejudice of the workers and the enquiry was found to be pre-planned for targeting the workers. It was also held that the available evidence was not sufficient to arrive at a conclusion that workers were guilty of the charges levelled. After considering the entire matters and the irregular manner in which the enquiry was conducted and the charges answered, the Labour Court came to the conclusion that the enquiry was arbitrary and defective. After setting aside the enquiry report, the management was granted an opportunity to prove the charges against the workers.

¶104

The above order is under challenge.

¶105

I have heard Sri. P.Ramakrishnan, the learned counsel

¶106

appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the workers.

¶107

I find that the Division Bench of this Court in Chelamattom

¶108

Sree Krishna Swami Devaswom Trust v. State of Kerala¹ had

¶109

1 [2022 (4) KLT 90]

¶110

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021 & connected cases

¶111

¶112

lamented that the writ petitions challenging the preliminary orders passed by the Labour Court continued to be entertained by this Court leading to avoidable procrastination of the main proceedings before the Court/Tribunal. It was observed that parties who challenge the preliminary orders ought to be relegated to the Labour Court for the culmination of proceedings before that Court with the liberty to challenge the preliminary order if required along with the final award.

¶113

The contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that the Labour Court has committed an egregious error in passing a common preliminary award on 8 separate disputes. It is also contended that the Labour Court ought not have considered all the matters together and ought to have refrained from making general observations as regards the vagueness of charges. Reliance is also placed on the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in St. Thomas Missions Hospital v. State of Kerala and another [2007 (2) KLT 415] and it is argued that if the order passed by the Labour Court is so perverse, interference can be made.

¶114

I find that the management had appointed a common enquiry

¶115

officer to conduct an enquiry into the charges of 8 individual workers. The

¶116

Labour Court has concluded that though it is the privilege of the enquiry

¶117

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶118

& connected cases

¶119

¶120

officer to frame charges for the sake of convenience, it would not be proper for him to deviate from the charges already framed in the charge sheet. It was also found that the enquiry officer has reduced the number of charges for the sake of convenience. He omitted to answer each issue that was framed by him separately and the same has resulted in failure of justice. It was in the said circumstances that the Labour Court had concluded that the findings of the enquiry officer were perverse and without proper appreciation of evidence.

¶121

Having considered the order passed by the Labour Court, I am of the considered opinion that the award does not suffer from any perversity or that it has led to an evident failure of justice.

¶122

In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to interfere with the preliminary order passed by the Labour Court, which is impugned in this writ petition. Reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the preliminary order along with the final order as observed in Chelamattom (supra), this writ petition is disposed of.

¶123

Sd/-

¶124

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V, JUDGE

¶125

IAP

¶126

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶127

& connected cases

¶128

¶129

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 155/2021

¶130

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶131

`EXHIBIT P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12.12.2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 15.12.2016` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`TRUE COPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11.2.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICER AND THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO.`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 18.5.2017` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE` `THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS ID NO.35 OF 2017.`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19.11.2020 IN ID NO.35/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT.`

¶132

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶133

& connected cases

¶134

¶135

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 509/2021

¶136

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶137

`EXHIBIT P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12.12.2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 13.12.2016` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`TRUE COPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11.2.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICER AND THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO.`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED` `22.5.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST` `RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS` `ID NO.42 OF 2017.`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19.11.2020 IN ID NO.42/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT.`

¶138

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶139

& connected cases

¶140

¶141

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 496/2021

¶142

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶143

`EXHIBIT`	`P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12.12.2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED NIL SUBMITTED` `BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P3`	`TRUE COPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11.02.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICER AND THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P4`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED` `22.05.2017 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST` `RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS` `ID NO.43 OF 2017.`
`EXHIBIT`	`P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19.11.2020 IN ID NO.43/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT.`

¶144

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶145

& connected cases

¶146

¶147

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 497/2021

¶148

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶149

`EXHIBIT P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12/12/2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 15/12/2016` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`TRUE COPY OF THE ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11/2/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICER AND THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 9/5/2017` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE` `THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS ID NO.38 OF 2017`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19.11.2020 IN ID NO.38/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT`

¶150

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶151

& connected cases

¶152

¶153

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 489/2021

¶154

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶155

`EXHIBIT P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12/12/2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 13/12/2016` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`TRUE COPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11/02/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICER AND THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO.`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED` `22/05/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST` `RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS` `ID NO.41 OF 2017.`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19/11/2020 IN ID NO.41/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT.`

¶156

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶157

& connected cases

¶158

¶159

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 285/2021

¶160

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶161

EXHIBITP1TRUECOPYOFTHECHARGEMEMODATED
12.12.2016SERVEDONTHE1STRESPONDENT
EXHIBITP2TRUECOPYOFREPLYDATED12.12.2016
SUBMITTEDBYTHE1STRESPONDENT
EXHIBITP3TRUECOPYOFENQUIRYREPORTDATED
11/2/2017SUBMITTEDBYTHEENQUIRY
OFFICERANDTHEENQUIRYPROCEEDINGS
ATTACHEDTHERETO
EXHIBITP4TRUECOPYOFAPPLICATIONDATED
12-05-2017SUBMITTEDBYTHE1ST
RESPONDENTBEFORETHE2NDRESPONDENTAS
IDNO.36OF2017.
EXHIBITP5THECOPYOFTHECOMMONAWARDDATED
19-11-2020INIDNo.36/2017AND
CONNECTEDDISPUTESPASSEDBYTHE2ND
RESPONDENT.

¶162

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶163

& connected cases

¶164

¶165

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 318/2021

¶166

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶167

`EXHIBIT P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12/12/2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT.`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED NIL SUBMITTED` `BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT,`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`TRUE COPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11/2/2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICE AND THE ENQIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO.`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED 9/5/2017` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE` `THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS ID NO.37 OF 2017.`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19/11/2020 IN ID NO.34/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT.`

¶168

W.P.(C) No.82 of 2021

¶169

& connected cases

¶170

¶171

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 82/2021

¶172

PETITIONER(S)EXHIBITS

¶173

`EXHIBIT P1`	`TRUE COPY OF CHARGE MEMO DATED` `12-12-2016 SERVED ON THE 1ST RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT P2`	`TRUE COPY OF REPLY DATED 15-12-2016` `SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT`
`EXHIBIT P3`	`TRUE COPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT DATED` `11-2-2017 SUBMITTED BY THE ENQUIRY` `OFFICER AND THE ENQUIRY PROCEEDINGS` `ATTACHED THERETO`
`EXHIBIT P4`	`TRUE COPY OF APPLICATION DATED` `19-05-2017 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST` `RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS` `ID NO.37 OF 2017`
`EXHIBIT P5`	`TRUE COPY OF COMMON AWARD DATED` `19-11-2020 IN ID NO.38/2017 AND` `CONNECTED DISPUTES PASSED BY THE 2ND` `RESPONDENT`

Trivandrum Club, v. G. Chandrakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Trivandrum Club, v. G. Chandrakumar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aliyar Em Vs Union of India

Suharabi Vs the Secretary

Arun Nath, Vs the Secretary

Trivandrum Club Vs T. Madhu

Trivandrum Club, Vazhuthacaud Vs Vishnu M

Trivandrum Club Vs Raju P.