Dismissed
M.J.Gold v. Union of India
Kerala HCWP(C)/7438/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Court dismissed writ petition as infructous due to efflux of time and vacated interim order.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed as infructous; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH WEDNESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 7438 OF 2019
¶4
PETITIONERS:
¶5
1M.J.GOLD
X/1095, COPPEN LANE, NEW CHURCH CIRCLE, THRISSUR-
680001, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER,
M.K.ANTOCHAN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.M.L.KOCHUVARU, MANJALI
HOUSE, SKYLINE INFINITY 4A, MUNDUPALAM, THRISSUR-
680001.
2M.K.ANTOCHAN,
AGED 53 YEARS
S/O.M.L.KOCHUVARU, MANJALI HOUSE, SKYLINE INFINITY 4A,
MUNDUPALAM, THRISSUR- 680001.
BY ADVS.
GEORGE MATHEW
M.D.SASIKUMARAN
SUNIL KUMAR A.G
DIPU JAMES
BHANU THILAK
MATHEW K.T.
¶6
RESPONDENTS:
¶7
1 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, CENTRAL SECRETARIAT, NEW DELHI110001.
¶8
2 JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE, COCHIN ZONAL UNIT, VILUVANKAL, KAITHOTH ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI-682025.
¶9
3 THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE, COCHIN ZONAL UNIT, VILUVANKAL, KAITHOTH ROAD, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI- 682025.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
1.M.J.GOLD
- petitioner
2.M.K.ANTOCHAN
- respondent
1.UNION OF INDIA
- respondent
2.JOINT DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
- respondent
3.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court