Dismissed

Roy A.T. v. the Authorized Officer

Kerala HC15 Feb 2023WP(C)/3215/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition seeking permission to clear bank liabilities in instalments by directing the petitioner to pay overdue amounts in 15 equal monthly instalments and regularising the account upon completion, subject to continued recovery proceedings after default.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay overdue amounts in 15 equal monthly instalments; account to be regularised upon full payment.

Roy A.T. Vs the Authorized Officer — Dowry and Cruelty | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 15^TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 26TH MAGHA, 1944

¶5

WP(C) NO. 3215 OF 2023

¶6

PETITIONER:

¶7

ROY A.T. AGED 52 YEARS RAHUL BHAVAN, THEKKE NULLIYODU, THIRUPURAM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN – 695 525

¶8

BY ADV M.R.SASITH

¶9

RESPONDENT:

¶10

THE AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK REGIONAL OFFICE, KIZHAKEKOTTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 023

¶11

BY ADV THOMAS ABRAHAM

¶12

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶13

WP(C) NO. 3215 OF 2023

¶14

¶15

T.R.RAVI, J.

¶16

 WP (C) No.3215 of 2023

¶17

 Dated this the 15thday of February, 2023

¶18

JUDGMENT

¶19

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking
permission to wipe off the liabilities to the respondent Bank
in instalments. The counsel for the respondent Bank submits
that an amount of Rs.4,05,186/- is overdue.

¶20

In the above circumstances, the writ petition is disposed
of directing the petitioner to pay the amounts overdue to the
respondent Bank in 15 equal monthly instalments, along with
regular instalments, the first instalment becoming payable on
or before 15.03.2023 and the subsequent instalments
becoming payable on or before the 15th day of the succeeding
months. After receiving the entire overdue amounts, the
respondent shall regularise the loan account. If the petitioner
makes two consecutive defaults in the payment of instalments
as directed above, the respondent Bank will be at liberty to

¶21

WP(C) NO. 3215 OF 2023

¶22

¶23

continue with the proceedings for recovery. Coercive steps

¶24

for recovery shall be kept in abeyance for facilitating the

¶25

payments by instalments as directed above.

¶26

Sd/-

¶27

T.R.RAVI

¶28

JUDGE

¶29

sn

¶30

WP(C) NO. 3215 OF 2023

¶31

¶32

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 3215/2023

¶33

PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS

¶34

Exhibit P1

¶35

THE TRUE COPY OF THE POSSESSION NOTICE ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK DATED 16/01/2023

¶36

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL

¶37

//TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

Roy A.T. v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Roy A.T. v. the Authorized Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alice Varghese Vs Canara Bank

Sajitha Mumthas Vs the Urban Cooperative Bank Ltd. No. 1758, Perinthalmanna

Surendran K K Vs Irinjalakuda Town Co-Operative Bank Ltd., NO.55

Sreeja Sibi Vs the Authorised Officer

Sreekumar.S. Vs Authorized Officer, Kerala Grameen Bank

Manoj J Chirayath Vs The Manager state Bank of India