Alice Varghese v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
A writ petition challenging a sale proceeding for realization of bank dues was dismissed as infructuous since the scheduled auction did not take place. Closing does not prejudice pending claims before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is closed as infructuous since the scheduled sale did not take place.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 25TH MAGHA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 1437 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
MRS.ALICE VARGHESE AGED 63 YEARS W/O VARGHESE ANTONY, PAREKKADAN HOUSE, CHENGALOOR POST, OOTY GARDEN, KIZHAKKUMPATTUKARA, THRISSUR NOW RESIDING AT AL FIDA OFFICE EQUIPMENT, AL FIDA OFFICE, NAKHEL ROAD 30, PB NO 4457, DUBAI, PIN – 680 312
BY ADVS. NIDHI BALACHANDRAN THOMAS C.ANTONY
RESPONDENTS:
1 CANARA BANK REPRESENTED BY IT'S BRANCH MANAGER, WEST PALACE BRANCH, THRISSUR, PIN – 680 020
2 AUTHORISED OFFICER
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition challenging proceeding for sale of property becomes infructuous when the scheduled sale did not take place.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MRS.ALICE VARGHESE
- respondent
CANARA BANK
Coram
T.R.RAVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court