Arun Shankar v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge noted the record showing approval of appointment on daily wages. The Government Pleader submitted no specific Government Orders exist as per prior guidelines. Court recorded this submission and closed the petition without deciding the merits.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
WEDNESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 15TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 31093 OF 2023
PETITIONER:
ARUN SHANKAR
AGED 42 YEARS
SCHOOL MANAGER, VELAYUDHA VILASOM VOCATIONAL HIGHER
SECONDARY SCHOOL, AYATHIL, KOLLAM, PIN – 691 021
BY ADVS.
LINDONS C.DAVIS
E.U.DHANYA
N.S.SHAMILA
CHINJU P. JOYIES
RESPONDENTS:
1STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,
GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001
2 DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, HOUSING BOARD BUILDING, SANTHINAGAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN – 695 001
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the appointment approval should be considered given the lack of specific government orders for aided schools.
Whether the insistence on prior government approval for appointments in aided schools is legally enforceable.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ARUN SHANKAR
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
DIRECTOR OF GENERAL EDUCATION
- respondent
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF VOCATIONAL HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION
- respondent
NISHA BOSE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court