The petitioner, Muhammad RafEEK, filed a writ petition. The court observed that the petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and is not being pressed, leading to its dismissal on the same day it was admitted.
The writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1945
WP(C) NO. 162 OF 2021
PETITIONER:
MUHAMMED RAFEEK
AGED 45 YEARS
S/O.LATE P. K. ALIYAR, POOKKADASERIYIL HOUSE,
MARKET P.O, MUVATTUPUZHA-686627.
BY ADVS.
JOBI.A.THAMPI
SHRI.SHAJI V.T.
SRI.SUBIN K SUDHEER
RESPONDENTS:
1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2 KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED (SUPPLYCO), MAVELIBHAVAN, KADAVANTHARA-682020, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.3 THE DEPOT MANAGER ERNAKULAM DEPOT, KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED,(SUPPLYCO) PETTA, KOCHI-682301.4 THE DEPOT MANAGERSUPPLYCO KOCHI DEPOT, CHULLICKAL, KOCHI-682005.5 THE DEPOT MANAGER SUPPLYCO PARAVUR DEPOT, MAKKANAYI MANNAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN-683520.6 THE DEPOT MANAGER SUPPLYCO, AMBLAPPUZHA TALUK, BEACH ROAD,ALAPPUZHA-688001.7 MANAGER NFSA, MAVELI BHAVAN, KADAVANTHARA-682020.8 MUHAMMED HUSSAIN AGED 43 YEARS S/O MUHAMMED SALIM, PULICKAL PARAMBIL, ALUSSERY WARD, ALAPPUZHA.9 FAZIL ABDUL RAHIMAN S/O ABDUL RAHIMAN, AGED 50 YEARS, KOCHUPARAMBIL, CIVIL STATION WARD, ALAPPUZHA.WP(C) NO. 162 OF 2021 2
10GALAXY TRAVEL CLUB
4TH FLOOR, RASHED TOWER, KARIMPATTA CROSS ROAD,
PALLIMUKKU, KOCHI-682016.
BY ADVS.
SRI.R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN
SRI.P.VISWANATHAN (SR.)
SRI.AJITH VISWANATHAN
SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
13.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C) NO. 162 OF 2021 3
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time and that he is not pressing the same.
This writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/-
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
JUDGE
MC/13.11
WP(C) NO. 162 OF 2021 4
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 162/2021
PETITIONER EXHIBITSEXHIBIT P1TRUE COPY OF THE17016/20 DATED 15RESPONDENT. |
TENDER NOTICE NO.NFSA 5-.07.2020 PUBLISHED BY 2ND |
|---|---|
EXHIBIT P1(A)TRUE COPY OF THE30.07.2020. |
CORRIGENDUM DATED |
EXHIBIT P2TRUE COPY OF THEEVALUATION COMMIT |
PROCEEDINGS OF THETEE DATED 16.09.2020. |
EXHIBIT P3TRUE COPY OF THETECHNICAL AND FININ RESPECT OF KAN |
TENDER SUMMARY REPORTS OFANCIAL BID DATED 6.10.2020AYANNUR TALUK. |
EXHIBIT P3(A)TRUE COPY OF THETECHNICAL AND FININ RESPECT OF KOC |
TENDER SUMMARY REPORTS OFANCIAL BID DATED 6.10.2020HI TALUK. |
EXHIBIT P3 (B)TRUE COPY OF THETECHNICAL AND FININ RESPECT OF NOR |
TENDER SUMMARY REPORTS OFANCIAL BID DATED 6.10.2020TH PARAVOOR. |
EXHIBIT P3 (C)TRUE COPY OF THETECHNICAL AND FININ RESPECT OF AMB |
TENDER SUMMARY REPORTS OFANCIAL BID DATED 6.10.2020ALAPPUZHA TALUK. |
EXHIBIT P4TRUE COPY OF THEACCEPTANCE OF TECBIDDERS IN KANAYA |
COMPLAINT AGAINST THEHNICALLY DISQUALIFIEDNNUR TALUK. |
EXHIBIT P4(A)TRUE COPY OF THEACCEPTANCE OF TECBIDDERS IN KOCHI |
COMPLAINT AGAINST THEHNICALLY DISQUALIFIEDTALUK. |
EXHIBIT P4(B)TRUE COPY OF THEACCEPTANCE OF TECBIDDERS IN NORTH |
COMPLAINT AGAINST THEHNICALLY DISQUALIFIEDPARAVUR TALUK. |
EXHIBIT P4(C)TRUE COPY OF THEACCEPTANCE OF TECBIDDERS IN AMABAL |
COMPLAINT AGAINST THEHNICALLY DISQUALIFIEDAPPUZHA. |
EXHIBIT P5TRUE COPY OF THE17016/20 DATED 27 |
INSTRUCTION NO NFSA 5-/08/2020. |
EXHIBIT P6TRUE COPY OF THE8TH RESPONDENT. |
TECHNICAL BID DOCUMENTS OF |
EXHIBIT P6(A)TRUE COPY OF THE9TH RESPONDENT. |
TECHNICAL BID DOCUMENTS OF |
EXHIBIT P6(B)TRUE COPY OF THE10TH RESPONDENT. |
TECHNICAL BID DOCUMENTS OF |
EXHIBIT P6(C)TRUE COPY OF THERESPONDENT. |
AFFIDAVIT OF 8TH |
EXHIBIT P6(D)TRUE COPY OF THERESPONDENT. |
AFFIDAVIT OF 9TH |
WP(C) NO. 162 OF 2021 5
EXHIBIT P7 |
TRUE COPY OF THEBY THE PETITIONER |
REPRESENTATION SUBMITTEDDATED 9/10/2020. |
|---|---|---|
EXHIBIT P8 |
TRUE COPY OF THENO.35249 OF 2018 |
JUDGMENT IN WRIT PETITIONOF THIS HON'BLE COURT. |
EXHIBIT P9 |
TRUE COPY OF THEOF 2020 OF THIS H |
JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO.21833ON'BLE COURT. |
EXHIBIT P10 |
TRUE COPY OF THEPETITIONER BEFORE |
STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THETHE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
EXHIBIT P10(A) |
TRUE COPY OF THE9TH RESPONDENT. |
STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THE |
EXHIBIT P10(B) |
TRUE COPY OF THE10TH RESPONDENT B |
STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY THEEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT. |
EXHIBIT P11 |
TRUE COPY OF THE28/12/2020 OF THE |
PROCEEDINGS DATED2MND RESPONDENT. |
EXHIBIT P12 |
TRUE COPY OF THETHE RIGHT TO INFO |
INFORMATION OBTAINED UNDERRMATION ACT. |
EXHIBIT P13 |
PHOTO COPY OF THE2017 IN WPC NO.26 |
INTERIM ORDER DATED 19-9-41/2017 |
EXHIBIT P13 A |
PHOTO COPY OF THEIN WPC 26401/2017 |
JUDGMENT DATED 8/10/2018 |
EXHIBIT P14 |
PHOTOCOPY OF THENO.27/2017/TRANS |
NOTIFICATION VIDE GO(P)DTD.15/11/2017 |
EXHIBIT P15 |
COPY OF THE APPLIPETITIONER DTD. 2 |
CATION SUBMITTED BY THE0/11/2020 |
EXHIBIT P16 |
PHOTO COPY OF THE |
LETTER DATED 19/1/2021 |
EXHIBIT P16A |
PHOTO COPY OF THETRANSPORTING CONTRESPONDENT NFSA M |
ANNEXED LIST OFRACTORS ISSUED BY THE 7THANAGER |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition has become infructuous due to efflux of time.
MUHAMMED RAFEEK
STATE OF KERALA
KERALA STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED (SUPPLYCO)
THE DEPOT MANAGER ERNAKULAM DEPOT
THE DEPOT MANAGER SUPPLYCO KOCHI DEPOT
THE DEPOT MANAGER SUPPLYCO PARAVUR DEPOT
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court