The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that they were not pressing the appeal. The Regular Second Appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU
TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 30TH KARTHIKA, 1945
RSA NO. 1440 OF 2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 4/2004 OF THE
SUBORDINATE COURT, CHERTHALA
ARISING FROM THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 408/1997 OF
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF COURT, CHERTHALA
APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
ODAMPALLY DEVASWAM TRUST
PANAVALLY P.O, PANAVALLY VILLAGE,
REPRESENTED BY ITS
1. PRESIDENT VIJAYAN KAIMAL, AGED 62 YEARS,
KALARIKKAL, PANAVALLY P.O, PANAVALLY VILLAGE
2. SECRETARY SIVANANDAN, AGED 66 YEARS,
PUTHANPURAKKAL SREEVALSAM VEEDU,
PANAVALLY VILLAGE, PANAVALLY P.O
3. TREASURER B.BALANAND, AGED 40 YEARS,
BIJU BHAVAN, PANAVALLY P.O, CHERTHALA
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.JAYAKRISHNAN
SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR CHERTHALA
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
SUSEELAN KAIMAL, AGED 65 YEARS,
S/O.NARAYANAN NAMBOOTHIRI, MULLAKKARAYILAYA
KALAPPURAKKAL, PANAVALLY VILLAGE,
PANAVALLY MURI, PIN – 688 566
BY ADVS.
SRI.RILGIN V.GEORGE
SMT.K.P.SANTHI
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 21.11.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
RSA NO. 1440 OF 2013
2
K.BABU, J
R.S.A No.1440 of 2013
Dated this the 21st day of November, 2023
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellants Sri.R.Krishnakumar
submits that the appellants are not pressing the appeal. The submission is recorded. Accordingly, the Regular Second Appeal is
dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
K.BABU
ab
ODAMPALLY DEVASWAM TRUST
SUSEELAN KAIMAL
K. BABU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court