Georgekutty v. Susheela
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals by Georgekutty were dismissed as the appellant filed a memo stating the dispute was settled and respondents were satisfied with the decree, withdrawing the interest to continue the appeal.
What did the court decide?
Appeals RSA Nos. 111 & 112 of 2015 dismissed on account of settlement between parties and closure of matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023 / 28TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
RSA NO. 111 OF 2015
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN AS 131/2007 OF SUB COURT,KOTTARAKKARA
OS 23/2004 OF MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTARAKKARA
APPELLANT/2ND APPELLANT/2ND PLAINTIFF:
GEORGEKUTTY
AGED 50 YEARS S/O.UNNUNNI, VALIYAVILA VEEDU, PALLICKAL P.O.MYLOM VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK.
BY ADVS. GEORGEKUTTY(Party-In-Person) RADHIKA S.ANIL(K/000183/2019)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
GEORGEKUTTY
- respondent
SUSHEELA
- respondent
RAVEENDRAN PILLAI
- respondent
GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI
- respondent
RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court