Dismissed
Sunil v. John Joseph
Kerala HCRSA/892/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1945
RSA NO. 892 OF 2020
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 27.02.2020 IN A.S.NO. 19/2018 OF II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM
DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 09.08.2017 IN OS 70/2015 OF PRINCIPAL
MUNSIFF COURT, ERNAKULAM
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:
1 SUNIL AGED 51 YEARS S/O. LATE PARAMU, CHOOTHATHAPARAMBU, PONNARIMANGALAM, MULAVUKAD P.O, MULAVUKAD VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2 SUDHEER AGED 49 YEARS S/O. LATE PARAMU, CHOOTHATHAPARAMBU, PONNARIMANGALAM, MULAVUKAD P.O, MULAVAVUKAD VILLAGE,KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, NOW RESIDING AT THINKAL NADUVILEPARAMBIL HOUSE, BLAYIKADAVU ROAD, NEAR SHAPUMPADY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3 SURESH AGED 47 YEARS S/O. LATE PARAMU, CHOOTHATHAPARAMBU, PONNARIMANGALAM, MULAVUKAD P.O, MULAVAVUKAD VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT,
BY ADVS. PRAVEEN.HARIHARAN SRI.G.HARIHARAN SMT.K.S.SMITHA SMT.T.T.SHANIBA SRI.M.V.VIPINDAS SHRI.AMAL DEV D SMT.AKHILA P.
RSA NO. 892 OF 2020
2
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:
1 JOHN JOSEPH AGED 43 YEARS S/O. GEORGE, KATTIKARAN HOUSE, MARKET ROAD, ERNAKULAM VILLAGE OF KANAYANNUR TALUK IN ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682011,
2 SUDHA AGED 56 YEARS W/O. BHADRAN, PALAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KANNACHANTHODU, PACHALAM P.O, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, 682011.
3 AJESH NARAYANAN, AGED 36 YEARS S/O. NARAYANAN, KONNOTH HOUSE, NADAKAVU P.O, UDAYAMPEROOR, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT - 682307.
BY ADVS. B.ASHOK SHENOY C.G.PREETHA P.S.GIREESH ARJUN R NAIK
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.12.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
RSA NO. 892 OF 2020
3
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 18th day of December, 2023
This regular second appeal has been filed under Section 100 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the decree and judgment dated 27.02.2020 in A.S.No.19/2018 on the files of the Sub Court, Ernakulam, arose out of the decree and judgment dated 09.08.2017 in O.S.No.70/2015 on the files of the Principal Munsiff's Court, Ernakulam.
Registry shall inform this matter to the trial court as well as the appellate court for information and future guidance.
Sd/A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE
nkr
SUNIL
SUDHEER
SURESH
JOHN JOSEPH
SUDHA
AJESH NARAYANAN
A. BADHARUDEEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court