Sathyabhama v. Advocate Madhusoodanan Nair
Case brief
What is this about?
This review petition challenging an order dated 07.04.1989 was closed by the High Court of Kerala, as correcting the cause title would not benefit the petitioners due to the proceedings before the Appellate Authority remaining unchanged.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 14TH BHADRA, 1945
RP NO. 94 OF 2013
AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRP 1787/1988 DATED 07.04.1989
PETITIONER:
1 SATHYABHAMA, D/O.UNNIAMMA, POTTASSERI AMSOM AND DESOM, MANNARGHAT TALUK, PALGHAT DIST (DIED)
2 K.P. BALAKRISHNAN, AGED 76 YEARS, S/O PANKI (HUSBAND OF SATHYABHAMA), KAPPUKADU HOUSE, P.O POTTASSERRY, KALLAMALA, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN – 678 598
3 USHAKUMARI, D/O SATHYABHAMA, KAPPUKADU HOUSE, P.O.POTTASSRRY, KALLAMALA, MANNARKKAD, PALAKKAD DISTRICT, PIN – 678 598
(ADDL PETITIONERS P2 AND P3 ARE IMPLEADED AS THE LEGAL
HEIRS OF THE DECEASED FIRST PETITIONER VIDE ORDER DATED
24.05.2017 IN IA 790/17)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a review petition can be allowed to correct thecause title of a Criminal Revision Petition regarding the name of the respondent before the Appellate Authority.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SATHYABHAMA
- petitioner
K.P. BALAKRISHNAN
- petitioner
USHAKUMARI
- respondent
ADVOCATE MADHUSOODANAN NAIR
- respondent
RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O.THAZHATHU VEETTIL KOTTAYI
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court