the alleged factual error by the review petitioner in the operative part of the judgment was largely on account of not reading the operative portion of the judgment in the light of paragraphs 5, 8, and 9 of the same judgment. The contention of the review petitioner is that there was no actual shifting of teachers, namely, Smt. Sreelatha and Smt.Rakhi as LPSAs in the school, since the Manager had not formally shifted them from the post of UPSAs to the post of LPSAs through any formal order. In paragraphs 3, 4, and 8 of our judgment dated 24.05.2022, we have clearly narrated the factual aspects of the case and, in particular, the fact that in all the staff fixation orders from 19992000 to the academic year 2015-2016, the aforesaid teachers were shown against the cadre strength of LPSAs in the school. It was in that background that, notwithstanding that no formal orders of shifting of the aforesaid teachers as LPSAs was passed by the Manager, we took note of the fact that the education authorities had recognised the said teachers as LPSAs in the school during the period from 1999-2000 till 2015-2016. The recognition of the said teachers as LPSAs in the staff fixation orders passed in terms of the Kerala Education Act and Rules was deemed sufficient to treat the said teachers as shifted from the post of UPSAs to LPSAs in the school. It was in the backdrop of the said facts that the operative portion of the judgment mentioned that