This review petition was dismissed because orders directed in the impugned judgment were already passed, rendering the review unnecessary.
Dismissal of the Review Petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
MONDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 13TH BHADRA, 1945
RP NO. 748 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 35579/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER:
KOOVAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH
KOOVAPPADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT , REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN - 683544
BY ADV R.RENJITH
RESPONDENTS:
1 PAULOSE P AGED 72 YEARS, PARAPPURAM HOUSE, AYATHUPADY, KOOVAPPADY P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 683544
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
R.P. No.748 of 2023 in W.P.(C) No.35579 of 2022
: 2 :
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
R.P. No.748 of 2023 in
W.P.(C) No.35579 of 2022
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that orders have been passed as directed in the judgment dated 20.02.2023.
In view of the same, the judgment does not require any review as sought for. Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed.
Sd/- VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE
sm/
KOOVAPPADY GRAMA PANCHAYATH
PAULOSE P
ANOOP
SIJAN
ASSISTANT ENGINEER, LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AND ENGINEERING WING
VIJU ABRAHAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
