James Abraham v. Abhilash Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 16TH BHADRA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 1114 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 10.04.2023 IN WP(C) 4581/2023 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C):
JAMES ABRAHAM, AGED 63 YEARS
S/O ABRAHAM, KOLANGAYIL HOUSE,
PIRAVOM P.O, - 686664
BY ADV CHITRA JOHNSON
RESPONDENT/4TH RESPONDENT IN WP(C):
ABHILASH KUMAR,AGED 41 YEARS,
S/O HARIDASAN NAIR T.A.,
SECRETARY MUNICIPALITY OF PIRAVOM
MUNICIPAL OFFICE, PIRAVOM P.O,
ERNAKULAM, PIN - 686664
BY ADV K.S.ARUN KUMAR
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
07.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Con.Case (C) No.1114 of 2023 in W.P.(C) No.4581 of 2023
2
VIJU ABRAHAM, J.
................................................................. Con.Case (C) No.1114 of 2023 in
W.P.(C) No.4581 of 2023
................................................................. Dated this the 7th day of September, 2023
JUDGMENT
When the matter was taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the respondent submitted that the sand kept in the property of the petitioner was removed and thereby the order has been complied with. Recording the same the contempt is closed.
Sd/-
VIJU ABRAHAM
JUDGE
cks
Con.Case (C) No.1114 of 2023 in W.P.(C) No.4581 of 2023
3
APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 1114/2023
PETITIONER ANNEXURES
Annexure A1CERTIFIED COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER
DATED 10.04.2023 IN WPC NO:4581/2023
Annexure A2A TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
RECEIPT DATED 19.04.2023
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS
Exhibit R1(A)A photostat copy of the agreement
between the writ petitioner and the
5th respondent therein
JAMES ABRAHAM
ABHILASH KUMAR
VIJU ABRAHAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court