Muktha K.N v. Brinda
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court at Ernakulam dismissed two review petitions filed against a common judgment regarding the jurisdiction of the Family Court and Civil Court, noting the petitioner was willfully absent when necessary to contest the matter.
What did the court decide?
The review petitions are dismissed. The trial court is directed to expedite the trial and dispose of the suits within four months of the receipt of a certified copy of this order.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1945
RP NO. 13 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RSA 44/2022 DATED 30.08.2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
MUKTHA K.N
AGED 61 YEARS, D/O NARAYANAN,
KOYIKKALETHU, MARUTHOORKULANGARA SOUTH, ALUMKADAVU P.O.,
KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM, PIN:690573.
BY MUKTHA K.N(Party-In-Person)
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS:
1BRINDA
AGED 60 YEARS
D/O. INDIRA, THAIMOOTTIL, ALAPPAD P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM.
PIN: 690525.
2JAYAKRISHNAN,
AGED 57 YEARS
S/O. NARAYANAN, CHITTEPPADATHU, VENNALA P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN:
682028.
3JAYASREE,
AGED 54 YEARS
D/O. INDIRA, KODIVEETTIL, THUMPOLI P.O., ALAPPAUZHA. PIN: 655005 .
4GOPAKUMAR,
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O. LATE NARAYANAN, ASWATHY BHAVANAM, KALLELIBHAGOM VILLAGE,
KALLELIBHAGOM P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY. KOLLAM, PIN: 690519.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the review petitions filed under Section 114 and Order 47 Rule I of the Civil Procedure Code against the common judgment require to be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUKTHA K.N
- respondent
BRINDA
- respondent
JAYAKRISHNAN
- respondent
JAYASREE
- respondent
GOPAKUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court