Muktha K.N v. Brinda
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses two review petitions filed under CPC regarding a common judgment on family court jurisdiction. The court found the petitioner was served notice but absent willfully, deeming the petitions meritless and emphasizing expedited trial of suits.
What did the court decide?
The review petitions R.P. Nos. 13 & 14 of 2023 are dismissed as meritless.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 22ND KARTHIKA, 1945
RP NO. 13 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RSA 44/2022 DATED 30.08.2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:
MUKTHA K.N
AGED 61 YEARS, D/O NARAYANAN,
KOYIKKALETHU, MARUTHOORKULANGARA SOUTH, ALUMKADAVU P.O.,
KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM, PIN:690573.
BY MUKTHA K.N(Party-In-Person)
RESPONDENTS/APPELLANTS:
1BRINDA
AGED 60 YEARS
D/O. INDIRA, THAIMOOTTIL, ALAPPAD P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY, KOLLAM.
PIN: 690525.
2JAYAKRISHNAN,
AGED 57 YEARS
S/O. NARAYANAN, CHITTEPPADATHU, VENNALA P.O., ERNAKULAM, PIN:
682028.
3JAYASREE,
AGED 54 YEARS
D/O. INDIRA, KODIVEETTIL, THUMPOLI P.O., ALAPPAUZHA. PIN: 655005 .
4GOPAKUMAR,
AGED 52 YEARS
S/O. LATE NARAYANAN, ASWATHY BHAVANAM, KALLELIBHAGOM VILLAGE,
KALLELIBHAGOM P.O., KARUNAGAPPALLY. KOLLAM, PIN: 690519.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the review petitioner was properly served notice and absent without reasonable cause in the second appeals proceeding.
Whether any error apparent on the face of the records exists in the common judgment regarding jurisdiction of Family Court and Civil Court.
Whether the review petitions merit to be allowed or should be dismissed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Muktha K.N
- respondent
Brinda
- respondent
Jayakrishnan
- respondent
Jayasree
- respondent
Gopakumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court