Disposed
Raison v. Sabuleyan
Kerala HCRFA/545/2009
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In two appeals decided together, the Court was informed that the disagreement between parties was settled amicably. Relying on Madras HC precedent regarding out-of-court settlements, the Appeals Court disposed of both cases as settled and ordered a refund of court fees.
What did the court decide?
Both appeals disposed of as settled; entire court fee refunded to appellants.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
¶2
PRESENT
¶3
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
¶4
THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 25TH PHALGUNA, 1944
¶5
RFA NO. 545 OF 2009
¶6
AGAINST THE DECREE AND JUDGMENT DATED 21-03-2009 IN
O.S.NO.410/2007 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
¶7
APPELLANTS/PLAINTIFFS:
¶8
1RAISON, S/O CHIRAMELKOLANKANNY JOSE,
IRINJALAKUDA THEKKE ANGADI, MANAVALASSRY VILLAGE,
MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
¶9
2CICILY [DIED]
W/O.LATE CHIRAMEL KOLANKANNY JOSE, IRINJALAKUDA THEKKE
ANGADI, MANAVALASSRY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. *[THE
FIRST APPELLANT AND THE SECOND RESPONDENT ARE RECORDED
AS THE LEGAL HEIRS OF THE DECEASED SECOND APPELLANT,
VIDE ORDER DATED 02.03.2023 IN I.A. NO. 1/2023]
¶10
BY ADV T.N.MANOJ
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Raison
- appellant
Cicily
- respondent
Sabuleyan
- respondent
Saly
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court