K.K.Kunhahu v. K.C.Abdul Rahman
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed an appeal as abated. The appeal was dismissed because the appellant's counsel was absent and no representative appeared for the matter.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 24TH PHALGUNA, 1944
AS NO. 61 OF 2003
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 10.11.2000 IN OS 112/1996 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THALASSERY
APPELLANT/18TH DEFENDANT:
K.K.KUNHAHU, D/O.T.P.AHAMMED, RESIDING AT PEEPIN HOUSE,
NEAR IDIYANGARA MARKET, CALICUT-N 3, CLAICUT TALUK.
BY ADV P.R.VENKATESH
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS 1 TO 17 AND 19 TO 79, 81 TO
102, 104 TO 106:
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal stands abated due to the non-appearance of the counsel representing the appellant.
Whether the failure by the appellant to implead legal heirs of deceased respondents abates the proceedings.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
K.K.Kunhahu
- respondent
K.C. Abdul Rahman
Coram
P. Somarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court