P.K.Baby v. South Indian Bank Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the regular first appeal for non-prosecution. The appellant appeared in person without representation; the other party remained absent.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN
MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF MARCH 2023 / 29TH PHALGUNA, 1944
RFA NO. 155 OF 2005 (D)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 31.03.2004 IN OS No.608/2000
OF I ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, THRISSUR
APPELLANT:
P.K.BABY, AGED 50 YEARS, S/o KURIAN, PLAMOOD HOUSE, NEAR THRIKKAKKARA TEMPLE, THRIKKAKKARA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. M.R.VENUGOPAL
RESPONDENTS:
1 SOUTH INDIAN BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, SOUTH INDIAN BANK HEAD OFFICE, THRISSUR.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
P.K. Baby
- respondent
South Indian Bank Ltd.
Coram
P. Somarajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court