Disposed

Noufal Rafi v. Hajira

Kerala HC1 Aug 2023OP(Crl.)/197/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of an original petition under Section 89 CPC following a mediation settlement. The parties resolved their dispute via the mediation centre, and the court allowed the petition to be disposed of in accordance with the signed agreement.

What did the court decide?

The original petition is disposed of with liberty to the parties to go with the mediation agreement in accordance with law.

Noufal Rafi Vs Hajira — Kerala HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

In THE HIGH couRT oF rmALA AT ERILunIAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

TEE Horn:t]RABIdE HR.. 3OsTla§ A. EhrmARIrmEEli

¶4

TUESDAI, TEE IST Dun oF mcosT 2023 / 10m sRAV[INA, 1945

¶5

op(a31,.I No.197 oB__2o23

¶6

AGAINST gRE ciEWER/JUDG14ErNIMC: 23/2o22 oF FunLr cooRT,irourm

¶7

RETITICINtws =

¶8

REspoav"/ss	NOUFAL REI AGED 31 YEARS S/O. MUHARED RAFI, NANAS (CHERATTUKUZHI VEEDU) KALLAIATHANNI, ELAMPARAKKODU, POREDAM P.O, CHADAYAMANGALAM, REPRESENTED BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, M(JHAM4ED RAFI, AGED 61 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMrmD ABDUL RAVOOF, NANAs KALLADATHANNI, POREDAM p.O, CHADAYAMANGAI,AM VILI,PyGE, K01,LAM, PIN - 691534 LAILA BEAVI AGED 55 YEARS w/o. MI]HArmED RAFI, NANAS (cHERATTUKuzHI vEEDu) KAI.I,ADATHAVNI, ELAMPARAKKODU, POREDAM P.O, CHADAYAMANGALAM, PIN - 691534 NASNA BEGUM AGED 26 YEARS D/O. LAILA BEEVI, , NANAS (CHERATTUKUZHI VEEDU) KAI,LADATHANNI, ELAMPARAKKODU, POREDAM P.O, CHADAYAMANGALAM, REPRESENTED BY THE PowER oF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MUHArmmD RAFI, AGED 61 ¥EARs, s/o. MUHARED ABDUL RAVOOF, NANAS KALLADATHANNI , POREDAM P.O, CHADAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE, KOLLAM, PIN - 691534 MUHAMMED RAFI AGED 61 YEARS S/O. MUHARED ABDUL RA:WOOF, NANAS (CHERATTAKUZHI VEEDU) KALLADATHANNI , POREDAM P. O, CHADAYAMANGALAM VILLAGE , KOLLAM, PIN - 691534 BY ADVS. P. ANOOP (MULAVANA) rmANlun s.
	HAJIRA AGED 26 YEARS D/O. SABEENA, AL AMEEN BAITH VEEDU, SREEVILASAM NAGAR 127A, VADAKKEVILA P.O, ERIIVIPURAM, KOLLAM, PIN ~ 691011 BY ADVS. Mohan Lal a ASWIN V. NAIR(K/1019/2017)
THIS OP	(CRIMINAL) IIA:vlNG coiaE up FOR ADMISsloN oN
01.08.2023 TIRE FOLL	, TIE CotlRT ON Ting SAIm DAr DEI,IVERED OWING :

¶9

REspoav"/ss

¶10

OP. (Crl) No. 197 of 2023

¶11

• .2. .

¶12

ORDER

¶13

I)ated this the Or day of Augusb 2023

¶14

As per the memorandum of agreement under Section

¶15

89 of the Coder of Civil Procedure read with Rules 24 and

¶16

25 of the Civil Procedure (Mediation) Rules, 2005, the

¶17

matter has been settled and a copy of the mediation settlement is placed before this court.

¶18

In fact, the settlement was at the instance of the

¶19

mediation Centre, Kollam, where the main case (MC 23/2022 of the Family Court, Kollam) has been pending.

¶20

Therefore, in view of the compromise, this Original Petition stands disposed of with liberty to the parties to go

¶21

with the mediation agreement, in accordance with law.

Sd/-

A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE

RMV

9 oP. (Crl) No. 197 of 2023

¶26

• .3. .

¶27

	AppmiDlx oF op(CRI.. ) 197/2o23
PETITIONER EXHIBITS
Exhibit PI	THE TREE COPY OF THE PETITION IN MC NO. 23/2022 0F THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM DTD 20.01.2022
Exhibit P2	THE TRUE COPY 0F THE PETITION IN CMP NO. 325 0F 2022 IN MC NO. 23/2022 0F THE FAMILY COURT, KOLLAM DTD 21. 0./ . 2u22
Exhibit P3	TIIE TR:HE COPY OF THE OBJECTION I)TD 31.01.2023 IN CMP NO.325 0F 2022 IN MC NO. 23 0F 2022 IN FAMII.Y COURT, KOLLAI
Exhibit P4	TIIE TREE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 07.02.2023 IN CMP NO.325 0F 2022 IN MC NO. 23 0F 2022

¶28

RESPONDENTS I EXHIBITS 3NII.

¶29

TRUE COPY

¶30

P.A.TO JT-

¶31

|ha LfofrLocrdfi¢ I+8t C4>L~] q )Le*lat ?€#y¢ L)I/ L+,-_/ -bp CCR.L ) i **v** o lq 7 0F 2b Z,3 (ip riu:' L;:: i.; :. \„ ^ L 2 3i Le.I od qeh:: bounri Ichh pdr^Of rrtys -NIDuife( HAtr edrft~ dflLeAI Rtrypordut - ttGirh¢

¶32

MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT UNDER SECTION 89 0F THE CODE OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE READ WITH RULES 24AND 25 0F THE CIVIL PROCEDURE (MEDIATloN) RULES 2005

¶33

The parties above name beg to submit as follows:

¶34

(i) Theaforesaid suivs, Petition/s,Appeal/s, Complaintwere referred to

¶35

Mediationforresolvingthedisputebetweentheparties.IntheCourseofmediation,theyhave resolved their dispute and have agreed to the following terms and conditions:

¶36

"%#ife#;::#l±(:#Ful#£Gfuf:i cta*;==Q°QJwltrfi#+rtELiv=*ce:av (PrdGred+ ap R>}+ch 6ho ff :t~) |€crJ. urn ilk rsrpLkb:o^u A±rd R&rul is lA^rloi- l=;ro La^8;+ Cwl 6- tu:ng of rfz- fo&fird.rL cb.i-t,I u; .cr: ItL ¢¢f tyQi}3,o_ Gt -rtL P4J::t:ohai`` LFlct3^r>`^+ rizL rrf fu:eo~ be§nm##pr£#o£=crto:fdrut£±##|c-f|-i:rd::I

¶37

¶38

Fle"La cxt ejas c;5L;c:k o6u .9A-~ I I. an*ts,dr#ifrArigrf:F^#k ~ir;-:all Q3 pout rib ,c®#yR_end fuviferd

¶39

EdrQ-' v;iL=:%be#=Tof,i:tr:fu::::Aon,, bLff£„#, ng*k rift I.2. a : , L:::`:::ftq=o /or:eel V;|ngdr bchro ^rf u. f i.:I,^b::=:

¶40

ftrN::;:4:grrmA%.;p=: °Vjlt E , tLotb~ ulto :

¶41

vl)The xpoyulord 6Lbe adv: #:_. :lLM.nd:#(: c=#=n;ha;: PbL'f i _ ^byNI:tL, FT#~;{: /:a mG:; ::+-cLeH in.Ofttthck a:I -IT,I /I:/LT V;:i ,v). c wla Q3 /deoed2 P~JL`v# £Ly° tt+

¶42

lh~'bL R"fty C®unf , (Co(LCL~

¶43

Vn) flha FtpJ±6:ov`us ds oorLed rfLLfl f¢ our/I to;#d$

¶44

¢U; rf ucal ::dtryn#tryrty/;£= Edsiierderd`

¶45

%;b:: ¥¥Ou¥:a#eGv, Hrfe A

¶46

¶47

In view of the aforesaid agreement entered into between the parties, The parties pray that the suit/s, Petition/s, Appeal/s be decree/dismissed/ Disposed of, in terms of the aforesaid agreement. \

¶48

In view of the aforesaid agreement, the plaintiff/s Appellanvs prays For refund of the full institution Fee.

¶49

Parties will appear on before forthe Hon'ble Gout forp?ssin.g^Ordprs/Decree in terms of theabovesajd agreement. ~ _ t#:4habD#einvslar fifTff4r#Sjn,Hoflr!%oiebfj:thd~ qu pthhew. Plaintiff/s, Petitioner/s ckrd 8:#',:TnvashtAPP''Canvs4fttl^towtri±F-evE::::::envs a-Advocate for Advocate for --:-:i:-,:=-=:--i::-:i:--`--Plainrtiff/s, Pe Defendanvs ® Appellanvs,Applicanvs #,>#de" Respondenvs, Complainant. Accused

¶50

VERIFICATION

¶51

We, the parties above named, do hereby solemnly state and declare that what. Is confained|nparagraphsltolDAretruet°thebest°f°flr#::;:rt#+8:#f:j°£*Da¥#„L

¶52

Respondenvs ha/a Appellant/s,Applicant/s Complaint. I, t,ty, , ? 2q|o>/2®23 ® pg==. I=l',"ltry2bL3 Defendanvs, Respondenvs Accused #\d,A,o>9

Noufal Rafi v. Hajira

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Noufal Rafi v. Hajira

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Salam Vs Sumayya C

Sam C Abraham Vs State of Kerala

Fareed Ktun Vs State of Kerala

Saleena Vs Nisar M.P

Shaiby Vs State of Kerala

P.Suresh Babu Vs State of Kerala