Anticipatory bail application dismissed as petition was filed without representation and petitioner appeared unready to argue on merits despite final report filed in underlying case.
Petition stood dismissed due to non-appearance and lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 10TH SRAVANA, 1945
BAIL APPL. NO. 2439 OF 2021
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
SHAIBY AGED 40 YEARS THEKKUMKATTIL HOUSE, MANJALI, MATTUPURAM, NORTH PARAVUR, PIN - 683520
BY ADV M.K.FAISAL
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031
BY SRI.P.G.MANU, SR.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01.08.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
BAIL APPL. NO. 2439 OF 2021
2
ORDER
Dated this the 1st day of August, 2023
This is an application for anticipatory bail filed by the
petitioner under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
report already filed in this matter and the matter has been pending as C.C.No.1023/2019 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Aluva. As per the report of the Investigating Officer, the involvement of the petitioner in 8 more crimes also reported.
Since final report already filed and the petitioner is not
ready to argue the matter on merits, this petition stands dismissed.
Sd/-
A. BADHARUDEEN JUDGE
nkr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner who did not appear to argue?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHAIBY
STATE OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
