Mohanlal v. Suseela
Case brief
What is this about?
Matrimonial appeal by husband against dismissal of petition for restitution of conjugal rights. High Court upheld Family Court finding that wife left home due to cruelty, finding appeal sans merit.
What did the court decide?
Petition for restitution of conjugal rights was dismissed; appeal against dismissal dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL &
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
THURSDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 11TH KARTHIKA, 1945 MAT.APPEAL NO. 211 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER AND DECREE DATED 14/12/2022 IN OP 475/2019 OF FAMILY COURT,THRISSUR
APPELLANT/PETITIONER:
MOHANLAL
AGED 63 YEARS, S/O.PANIKKAKUDI VEETTIL RAGHAVAN, KUNTHALLUR LAL BHAVAN, CHIRAYINKEEZH P O & VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 695304
BY ADVS.PRABHU K.N. MANUMON A.
RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT:
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court erred in dismissing the petition for restitution of conjugal rights due to respondent's alleged cruelty.
Whether the trial court's finding that respondent left the matrimonial home due to reasonable cause warrants interference on appeal.
Whether the appellant is entitled to restitution of conjugal rights despite allegations of mental torture and gold misuse.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohanlal
- respondent
Suseela
Coram
Amit Rawal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court