Shaji v. Haseena
Case brief
What is this about?
This court disposed of a matrimonial appeal and a revision petition regarding the return of gold ornaments. The order sets aside the earlier judgment because the parties reached a settlement during a court-mediated conciliation.
What did the court decide?
Matrimonial Appeal No.87/2023 and RPFC No.117/2023 stood disposed of and the impugned judgments were set aside.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
&
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE C.S. SUDHA
WEDNESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 10TH KARTHIKA, 1945
MAT.APPEAL NO. 87 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP 583/2019 OF FAMILY COURT, MALAPPURAM
APPELLANT/RESPONDENT IN THE O.P.:
SHAJI
AGED 38 YEARS
S/O KUNJIMUHAMMED, VADAKKENGARA VEEDU,
VALLIYAMBADAM, KARIMBUZHA,
CHANDAKUNNU P.O, NILAMBUR VILLAGE,
NILAMBUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT., PIN – 679329
BY ADVS.
T.K.AJITH KUMAR
AISWARYA RAMESAN
HARITHA HARIDAS
RAJESH BABU CHELAT
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS IN THE O.P:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matrimonial appeal and revision petition should be disposed of in light of a settlement reached during mediation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shaji
- respondent
Haseena
- respondent
Shahana Sherin
- respondent
Rinsha Shemin
- respondent
Minha Mehanin
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court