compensated. Under no circumstances, the compensation can be denied under the said head. Therefore, I am of the view that the appellant is entitled to compensation for permanent disablement, and since the certification of the disability was made by the Medical Board, the same can be accepted for computation of the said compensation. The monthly income taken by the Tribunal was Rs.3,000/-. Even though the appellant claimed to be employed as an Assistant Sales Manager, no evidence has been adduced to substantiate the same. Considering the year of the accident, I find that the monthly income of Rs.3,000/- fixed by the Tribunal is reasonable. Thus, when the compensation for physical disability and consequential loss of earning capacity is calculated with the above monthly income and the percentage of disability of 40%, the compensation under this head would come to Rs.2,59,200/- [3000 x 12 x 18 x 40/100]. Similarly, the amount awarded by the Tribunal for attendant expenses, transportation, hospitalization, damage to clothing and extra nourishment is Rs.12,000/-. It is evident that the appellant had undergone in-patient treatment for a period of 123 days at different spells. Therefore, the attendant expenses have to be taken at the rate of Rs.100/- per day and thus, the amount would
