was observed that the appellant appeared before the Tribunal with an artificial limb. According to him, the amount awarded is only Rs.60,000/-, which is grossly inadequate. He also places reliance upon Annexure-A19 medical bills produced by him along with the appeal memorandum showing the cost of the artificial limb as 2,00,000/-. However, the crucial aspect to be noticed is that no amount was claimed towards the future treatment in the claim petition, but the Tribunal granted an amount of Rs.60,000/-. Therefore, in the absence of any materials produced before the Tribunal and the corresponding claim for the same, I am not inclined to accept the claim put forward by the appellant in its entirety. However, it is an undisputed fact that the appellant does require assistance of an artificial limb, and it may incur expenses in future. Hence, some amount is to be granted to meet such expenses. Therefore, a further amount of Rs.1,00,000/- is awarded under the said head. Apart from the above, as the accident and the consequential disabilities suffered by the appellant at the age of 20 years, some amount is to be awarded towards the loss of marriage prospects. Considering the age of the appellant and the date of the accident, I deem it appropriate to grant a further sum of Rs.75,000/- under this head.
