Ahammed Kunhi K. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
A Criminal Miscellaneous petition seeking quashing of an FIR in a completed case was dismissed as infructuous since the final report was already filed by the prosecution.
What did the court decide?
The petition to quash the FIR is dismissed as infructuous with liberty to defend the charge.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 17TH SRAVANA, 1945
CRL.MC NO. 8672 OF 2016
CRIME NO.451/2016 OF VELLARIKUNDU POLICE STATION
NOW PENDING BEFORE THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT-II,
HOSDURG, KASARAGOD
PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED:
AHAMMED KUNHI K. AGED 40 YEARS S/O.MOHAMMED KUNHI, LAYINAK ILLATHU, KAMMADAM, PARAPPA POST, KASARAGODE DISTRICT 671 533.
BY ADVS. SRI.JAI GEORGE SMT.DAISY A.PHILIPOSE
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition to quash the FIR is maintainable when the investigation is completed and the final report has been filed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
AHAMMED KUNHI K.
- respondent
STATE
Coram
A. BADHARUDEEN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court