Sajeev v. Chandran
Case brief
What is this about?
Revision petition filed to challenge an order on maintenance payment and observations of neglect. The High Court noted the petitioner's readiness to pay. It modified the impugned order to expunge the observation regarding neglect and directed the petitioner to comply.
What did the court decide?
Modification of the impugned order to expunge the observation of neglect and direction to comply with maintenance payment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN
MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 16TH SRAVANA, 1945
RPFC NO. 73 OF 2021
AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 09.07.2020 IN M.C.NO.230/2018 OF THE FAMILY COURT, PALAKKAD
REVISION PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT:
SAJEEV AGED 35 YEARS, S/O CHANDRAN, RESIDING AT THACHAMPOTTA, KOLAKKAPADAM, ERIMAYUR POST, ERIMAYUR AMSOM DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD-678 546. BY ADVS. G.P.SHINOD SRI.GOVIND PADMANAABHAN SHRI.AJIT G ANJARLEKAR
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 2ND RESPONDENT:
1 CHANDRAN
AGED 65 YEARS, S/O VELAYUDHAN, RESIDING AT THACHAMPOTTA, KOLAKKAPADAM, ERIMAYUR POST, ERIMAYUR AMSOM DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK, PALAKKAD-678 546.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether to modify the impugned order dealing with maintenance payment and observations regarding neglect.
Whether an observation affecting the integrity of the revision petitioner should be expunged.
Whether to direct compliance with the impugned order given the petitioner's willingness to pay maintenance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAJEEV
- respondent
CHANDRAN
- respondent
SAJITH
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court