Allowed

Ajay @ Ajayan, v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC18 Sept 2023CRL.A/1358/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal appeal, the High Court of Kerala granted regular bail to the appellant, who challenged the rejection of his bail in a case involving offences under the POCSO Act and the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The court observed that while the survivor was a minor, there was no allegation of video circulation or threat, and substantial investigation progress had occurred.

What did the court decide?

The appellant was enlarged on bail upon execution of a bond for Rs. 50,000 with two solvent sureties, each for Rs. 50,000.

Ajay @ Ajayan, Vs State of Kerala — Caste Atrocities | Kerala HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH

¶4

MONDAY, THE 18^TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023/27TH BHADRA, 1945

¶5

CRL.A NO. 1358 OF 2023

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER IN CRMP.3605/2023 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT-I(SPECIAL JUDGE), PALAKKAD

¶7

APPELLANT/SOLE ACCUSED:

¶8

AJAY @ AJAYAN,, AGED 21 YEARS, S/O.ANANDHAN, MANNAM HOUSE, KORATHUPARAMBU, VADAVANNUR.P.O, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD, PIN - 678504

¶9

BY ADV V.A.JOHNSON (VARIKKAPPALLIL)

¶10

RESPONDENTS:

¶11

1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682031 2 XXXX

¶12

BY SRI.M.P.PRASANTH, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR FOR R1.

¶13

THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Crl.A. No.1358/2023

: 2 :

N. NAGARESH, J.

Criminal Appeal No.1358 of 2023

¶19

Dated this the 18^th day of September, 2023

¶20

J U D G M E N T

¶21

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

¶22

The accused in Crime No.528/2023 of Nenmara

¶23

Police Station has filed this appeal invoking Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 aggrieved by the order dated 24.08.2023 in Crl.M.P. No.3605/2023 of the Special Judge/ Additional Sessions Judge-I, Palakkad Division.

¶24

The appellant was made an accused in Crime No.528/2023 of Nenmara Police Station for offences punishable under Section 363, 376(2)(n) and 354A(1)(i) IPC, Section 4(1) read with Section 3(a), Section 6 read with Section 5(1), Section 8 read with Section 7, Section 12 read with Section 11(iv) of the POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(va) of

Crl.A. No.1358/2023

: 3 :

the SC/ST (PoA) Act.

The appellant moved application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail. The Special Judge noted that there were some connection between the appellant and the survivor and even if it is taken that the sexual relation between the appellant and the survivor was with the consent of the survivor, she being a minor, the offences alleged will be attracted. The Special Judge also noted that the appellant had taken nude videos of the appellant. The Special Judge therefore dismissed the bail application.

¶29

Though notice was served on the survivor through the SHO concerned, the complainant has not turned up.

¶30

The criminal appeal would indicate that the appellant is aged only 21 years and the survivor was 17 years of age. The appellant and the survivor were in relationship. Though there is a report that the appellant had taken nude videos of the survivor, the survivor has no complaint to the effect that the videos were circulated or

¶31

Crl.A. No.1358/2023

¶32

: 4 :

¶33

threatened to be circulated by the appellant. There is no allegation that the videos were taken clandestinely. Substantial progress has been done in investigation of the case. The appellant has been in custody since 17.07.2023.

¶34

In the circumstances, in spite of the objections

¶35

raised by the Public Prosecutor to grant of bail, I am of the view that the appellant can be enlarged on bail.

¶36

The Criminal Appeal stands allowed. The order dated 24.08.2023 in Crl.M.P. No.3605/2023 of the Special Judge /Additional Sessions Judge-I, Palakkad Division is set aside. The appellant shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶37

(i) The appellant/accused shall be released on bail on his executing bond for ₹50,000/(Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties, each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Special Court concerned.

¶38

(ii) The appellant/accused shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper the evidence. He shall co-operate with the investigation and shall be

¶39

Crl.A. No.1358/2023

¶40

: 5 :

¶41

available for interrogation as and when directed by the Investigating Officer.

¶42

(iii) The appellant/accused shall not leave the jurisdiction of the Special Court without prior permission of the court.

¶43

(iv) The appellant/accused shall not involve in any other offence during the currency of bail and any such event, if reported to came to the notice of this Court, the same shall be a reason to cancel the bail hereby granted.

¶44

N. NAGARESH, JUDGE

¶45

Sd/-

¶46

aks/12.09.2023

Ajay @ Ajayan, v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay @ Ajayan, v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muhammed Ismail Kunju Vs Jyothi

Thressiamma Simon Vs State of Kerala

Dr.K.E.Eapen Vs Vishnu Raj IAS

P. Salimkhan Vs Herchan Lawrence D’Cruz

Abhinandh, Vs State of Kerala

Mini I. Vs Principal Secretary