Muhammed Ali v. V.A. Sahadevan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt of court case (C) no. 977 of 2023, the High Court of Kerala closed the proceedings as the petitioner submitted that prior directions in the underlying writ judgment had been complied with, leaving no matter for consideration.
What did the court decide?
Proceedings closed as compliance with directions was established.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 4TH SRAVANA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 977 OF 2023
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT WP(C) 15633/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
PETITIONER/S:
MUHAMMED ALI
AGED 40 YEARS
CHUNDAYIL HOUSE, MUDAVANTHERI, TUNERI, VADAKARA,
KOZHIKODE., PIN - 673505
BY ADV I.DINESH MENON
RESPONDENT/S:
V.A. SAHADEVAN
AGE AND NAME OF THE FATHER NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER/TAXATION VADAKARA
OFFICER, CIVIL STATION P.O., VADAKARA, PIN - 673101
BY ADV ADVOCATE GENERAL OFFICE KERALA
OTHER PRESENT:
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUHAMMED ALI
- respondent
V.A. SAHADEVAN
Coram
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court