Sambashivan v. Manoj K.R
Case brief
What is this about?
Contempt proceeding dismissed after petitioner submitted certified copies of the judgment and receipt proving compliance with prior directions regarding service of notices.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed as petitioner submitted evidence of compliance.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI
THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2023 / 4TH JYAISHTA, 1945
CON.CASE(C) NO. 861 OF 2023
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 35480/2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER/WRIT PETITIONER:
SAMBASHIVAN
AGED 67 YEARS
S/O.RAGHAVAN, ARAYKAL HOUSE, THURAVOOR SOUTH,
CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA – 688532.
BY ADVS.
JOBY CYRIAC
KURIAN K JOSE
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT:
MANOJ K.R
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER),
THE TAHSILDAR CHERTHALA(TAHSILDAR LR IN CHARGE), TALUK
OFFICE CHERTHALA, ALAPPUZHA - 688524
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SAMBASHIVAN
- respondent
MANOJ K.R
Coram
T.R. RAVI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court